Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura engagement report
@bida - 160K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.01%, Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 2026164x their median
Another one for @donk1337 😏 Spirit's superstar wins his third HLTV and @1xBet_Esports MVP award of 2026 at BLAST Open Porto https://t.co/W0426DyXWx
- Oct 18, 2026138x their median
Bora LOUD! Parabens pelo bi campeonato! Booooa @loud_lukxo
- Sep 15, 2026112x their median
Que esse post alcance o MÁXIMO de mulheres possível. Criamos o +segura, uma plataforma interativa que orienta mulheres sobre como e onde denunciar corretamente crimes virtuais (não só nos games). ⚠️É GRATUITA E NÃO RECOLHE INFO PESSOAIS Saiba mais: https://t.co/pwX8qNedNt
- Aug 28, 202689x their median
In CS2, the shadow render distance is affected by the resolution. Here's 4:3 vs 16:9 comparison at the highest video settings. This was discovered by u/crisjame while he was watching a match of Falcons vs. LVG. https://t.co/gdFmvg8sRh
- Aug 16, 202679x their median
Esse assunto de Molodoy e Yekindar não continuar na FURIA ao final do ano não me surpreenderia em nada. Com o FalleN se aposentando e o Yekindar não querendo ser IGL, a Furia precisaria de um brasileiro dando call em inglês ou teria uma lineup com mais gringos do que BR. Além disso, é um bom momento para resetar um pouco a expectativa do time em objetivos internacionais. O time atual é montado para batalhar pelo título, o próximo pode ser menos ambicioso. Novo projeto ao redor do KSC e yuurih?
- Aug 16, 202654x their median
Que moleque quebrado https://t.co/f1Xk1rpxNt
- Aug 22, 202650x their median
VAZOU! @FalleNCS tá puro? kkkkk https://t.co/vERHEN4VxC
- Sep 14, 202647x their median
🆕 @piriajrcs deixa time titular da @paiNGamingBR https://t.co/HBXpU0THHI
- Jul 24, 202645x their median
😬 https://t.co/Q8XYvyaApj
- Aug 26, 202632x their median
A story about what esports is really like. The dirty actions of players and their agents behind the organization’s back — all in the new video. Enjoy! https://t.co/rHll7g8EF1 https://t.co/mNh0HRGSYc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 160K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.307% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 164x its own typical post.
- What is Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura's engagement rate on X?
- Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura (@bida) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 159,891 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.01%, Bernardo 'BiDa' Moura sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bida have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @bida post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.