Back to @beyoncegarden's profile

๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š engagement report

@beyoncegarden - 388K followers on X

Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.119%
of 388K followers
Per impression
2.59%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
450
interactions (median)
Saved
0.319%
56 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.03/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191K interactions, about 425x its own typical post.

Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #appleevent.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.119%, ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026425x their median

    sheโ€™s so real for yanking that out her hand๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/t2BPCZMI7T

    184K5.6K90380530M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026267x their median

    2017 truly feels like a fever dream like this will always take me out๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/mrDYiUqGnP

    113K5.5K48895413M viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 2026218x their median

    the way doja catโ€™s jaw DROPPED on her instagram live here will forever have me in tears LMFAOOO๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/WWYtEX1Y3y

    91K5.5K78733311M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026151x their median

    now why would they start recording the city like that LMFAOOO๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/swsJRpOql5

    65K2.7K99591.2M viewsView on X
  • May 25, 2024121x their median

    what's the nastiest read you've ever seen someone give๐Ÿ˜ญ

    43K2.6K1.6K7.6K1.2B viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026121x their median

    theyโ€™re actually so real for that omfg๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿฅน https://t.co/YNhnkjA6Uv

    51K2.7K1586151.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026112x their median

    DONALD TRUMP SEPTEMBER 2026

    44K3.4K9342.3K13M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026100x their median

    this is genuinely so sad๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/5PBnHclkN0

    39K5.1K3682372.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202696x their median

    him saying โ€œturn it up๐Ÿค“โ€ will forever take me out LMFAOOO๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/0dkNvyZVW5

    39K4.0K1673083.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202676x their median

    OH HE ATE THAT SO BAD OMFG๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/pmGsBhN37a

    33K92719924431M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#appleevent

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 388K followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 191K interactions, about 425x its own typical post.

What is ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š's engagement rate on X?
๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š (@beyoncegarden) has an engagement rate of 0.119%, based on the median interactions across 96 original posts from the last 30 days against 387,701 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.119%, ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐˜†๐Ÿซง๐Ÿ’š sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @beyoncegarden have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @beyoncegarden post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going