Back to @azableh's profile

Adolfo Zableh engagement report

@azableh - 289K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.074%
of 289K followers
Per impression
2.60%
8.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
214
interactions (median)
Saved
0.067%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 214 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 2.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adolfo Zableh's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.074%, Adolfo Zableh sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 202618x their median

    Se sabe que los humanos podemos ser horribles, pero el terremoto de ayer dejó en evidencia que los activistas políticos y los influencers pueden llegar a ser seres de la peor calaña

    3.1K613381654K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.1x their median

    Lo que hay que restringir es el porte de esos termos Stanley

    1.7K211341749K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20267.2x their median

    La ciencia debería dejar de lado el desarrollo de la inteligencia artificial para centrarse en uno de los grandes misterios del universo: el bogotano hincha de Nacional

    1.3K186611827K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.8x their median

    En fútbol está la santísima trinidad: Pelé, Maradona, Messi, en cualquier orden. Luego están Cruyff y Ronaldo, el brasileño. Después vienen gustos personales y la historia, y ahí pongo a Di Stéfano, Beckenbauer y Romario, el mejor jugador dentro del área hasta que apareció Messi

    1.1K561021683K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20265.1x their median

    Le están cascando duro a James después del mundial, pero poco se habla de Juan Fernando Quintero, eterna promesa que nunca explotó. Lleno de talento pero incapaz de echarse un equipo al hombro, no corre, no aguanta más de media hora y nunca se afianzó en ningún club

    91096722043K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.5x their median

    Lo que estamos viendo es un remedo a la colombiana del partido republicano estadounidense. Como cuando quisieron replicar Breaking Bad haciendo Metástasis

    78815013815K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    Lo que pasa con Gabriela Muñoz y Jerome es eso que en Estados Unidos llaman 'overachievers'. Gente empeñada en obtener reconocimiento rápido y como sea. Son desesperantes porque se obsesionan con sentirse brillantes desde jóvenes; luego crecen y se vuelven un adulto más

    75010325934K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.9x their median

    Yo sé que acá hay mucho fundamentalista de los festivos, pero siete de los últimos once fines de semana lo han sido, y así no rinde. Rico cuando se es empleado, no tanto cuando se es independiente

    653558831158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.2x their median

    Macafolla no es mala, pero tampoco me parece hilarante, pues. El problema con Micky Ávila es que pretende caricaturizar a alguien que ya es de por sí una caricatura y, en este caso, la realidad es mejor y más delirante que la ficción

    6275110019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.8x their median

    No todos pueden ser influencers ni vivir de farmear aura, que el mundo necesita científicos, administradores, médicos, un diez para la selección; lo que sea, menos personas que, aunque se llaman generadoras de contenido, contenido es lo que menos generan. https://t.co/scOM55NYWw

    4551358513K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 214 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 2.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is Adolfo Zableh's engagement rate on X?
Adolfo Zableh (@azableh) has an engagement rate of 0.074%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 289,136 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.074%, Adolfo Zableh sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @azableh have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @azableh post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going