Back to @atlasfunded's profile

Atlas Funded engagement report

@atlasfunded - 78K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.166%
of 78K followers
Per impression
2.38%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
6.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
130
interactions (median)
Saved
0.046%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.166%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 2.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Atlas Funded's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.166%, Atlas Funded sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link66% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 66% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 248 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202646x their median

    WE ARE GIVING AWAY 10x $50,000 INSTANT FUNDED ACCOUNTS! 🚨 To enter: 1️⃣ Follow us. 2️⃣ Repost this post. 3️⃣ Quote this post with what you would do with a $50,000 Instant Funded Account. Your dream trade, your goal, whatever it actually means to you. 10 lucky winners will be randomly selected to win.

    2.0K1.8K1.2K98192K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20268.2x their median

    GIVEAWAY 🎉 8 × $50K Instant simulated accounts. Subscribe to r/atlasfundedcom and comment on the post to enter 👇 https://t.co/B5Ig49nguN

    536237287522K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20267.0x their median

    If we gave you a free $100k Instant account, would you pick Standard or Zero? Standard: 5% max drawdown, 25% consistency rule. 
Zero: 4% max drawdown, no consistency rule. Which would you choose?

    3841004121034K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.2x their median

    Introducing The Journal. We're giving away 5 x $50,000 Instant Funded Accounts to five people who journal every single day this week. To enter: 1️⃣ Follow us. 2️⃣ Repost this post. 3️⃣ Post a trading journal entry every day, Monday to Friday, with proof of a trade taken that day, tagging us. A losing day still counts. This is not about who wins the most, it is about what you actually learn from that day. Miss a single day and your entry is void ❌️ Five winners will be randomly selected in the weekend from everyone who completed all five days. Day one starts today ⏳️

    2851672101117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20264.9x their median

    Your first $10 unlocks $20 🚨 Deposit $10 and we add $20 of Atlas Balance plus a free Challenger Pack. That is $30 to spend on Atlas, and a pack to open on top. Claim yours by 4 November. Start now👇 https://t.co/cDriIZB5wQ https://t.co/xV7mSXAb5O

    333125878846K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.9x their median

    This is the final day for the Creator Drop. 10 x $25,000 FREE Instant Funded Accounts, entries close tonight. 1. Follow us. 2. Post a video on why you want to trade with Atlas. 3. Tag us. You had the time this round. Use what is left of it. Winners will be announced tomorrow.

    269126109913K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.6x their median

    Don't miss out on this offer 🚨 35% OFF ACROSS OUR INSTANT ZERO AND 2 STEP CHALLENGES. PLUS, 125% REFUND ONCE YOU PASS. Use code: SEPT The traders who start today are the ones getting rewarded next month. Time's ticking, get funded now👇️ https://t.co/WVnk2x6C4C https://t.co/l2C9krAmhx

    225168492424K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.5x their median

    If we gave you a free $100k account, would you pick Access or Instant Zero? Access: one phase, 3% profit target, $5 to start, rest paid when funded. Then 6% drawdown. 
Instant Zero: no evaluation, funded immediately. 4% drawdown, 2% daily loss limit, no consistency rule. Which would you choose? 🤔

    19849195722K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20263.4x their median

    If we gave you a free $100k account, would you pick Instant Zero or 1 Step Pro? Zero: no evaluation, funded immediately. 4% trailing drawdown, 2% daily loss limit, no consistency rule. 
1 Step Pro: one phase, 8% profit target, then 6% drawdown and 3% daily loss limit once funded. Which would you choose? 🤔

    20147194117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20263.0x their median

    We are planning something big. Do you want to be a part of it? Fill out this form: https://t.co/GNso1e4mVO Deleting in 24h.

    2885051320K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.166%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 2.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is Atlas Funded's engagement rate on X?
Atlas Funded (@atlasfunded) has an engagement rate of 0.166%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,309 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.166%, Atlas Funded sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @atlasfunded have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @atlasfunded post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going