Back to @arielhelwani's profile

Ariel Helwani engagement report

@arielhelwani - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 360 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.466%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
2.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
192
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
30.3/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 360 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.466% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 30.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 360 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #helwanishow, #ufc333, #ufc332.

Measured over 360 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #helwanishow, #ufc333, #ufc332.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ariel Helwani's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Ariel Helwani sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 345 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202646x their median

    With their loss tonight, the Los Angeles Dodgers are eliminated from the 2026 Postseason. There will be a new World Series champion in 2026. https://t.co/EaZ7jVZFgb

    8.5K1.1K580541299K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202646x their median

    We may need to add celly of the year to our awards … and this prob wins https://t.co/5vSf2CqunA

    10K5427349339K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202645x their median

    Alexander Volkov unexpectedly praises the UFC for giving Josh Hokit the title shot: "I want to be honest with you... I’m very supportive of this fight from the UFC. Josh Hokit, from what I know about him, has clearly been dealing with some mental illness, so it’s very admirable for the UFC to put a guy with a serious mental condition into a title shot. Of course he should go in front of me. Guys with this kind of situation should fight first... This is the easiest way for an American heavyweight to get a title shot right now. It’s an incredibly inspiring story of a guy with a mental illness who can fight for the heavyweight title. It’s very supportive from the UFC. It’s a very noble thing for the UFC to do for him with all his mental problems. So yeah, I support it. You can’t laugh about people who have a mental illness. Of course I’m not joking. I can do it later. He can try first. I’ve been here for almost 10 years in the UFC. He just needs a chance right now... I don’t think he’ll have another opportunity like this."

    9.8K322215901.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202644x their median

    Alexander Volkov blasts to Ciryl Gane calling Tom Aspinall “mentally fragile”: “I can say the same about Gane, honestly. Watch his fight with Jon Jones. He just gave up before the fight. He does dirty things. He puts his finger in an opponent’s eye and then says, ‘This guy is mentally fragile because I poked him and he doesn’t want to fight.’ You cheated. That’s not within the rules. If he didn’t do this, if he just punched him hard or did something legal, then he could say that. But he created a situation where the champion needed surgery and now can’t fight. Then in another fight with Pereira, he started punching the back of the head. I can’t say he does it on purpose, but he keeps doing it.”

    9.8K50111937281K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202638x their median

    Raoni Barcelos is conscious, I’m told. He’s able to speak and is able to move his fingers and toes. He’s currently getting a CT scan at a local Vegas hospital.

    8.3K32716563461K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202632x their median

    When speaking to the media earlier today, Dana White is asked why Wang Cong is getting a title shot. Naturally, he runs down her resume and starts listing notable wins. He says she beat Namajunas, Andrade and Grasso. Problem is, though, she’s NEVER fought ANY of those. Natalia Silva, Cong’s opponent, beat them. 🎥 @MMAFighting

    6.9K28925695829K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202629x their median

    Question for the Aussies: Does Volk get covered back home like other global Aussie sports stars? He really should. One of the greatest ever regardless of weight class. I’m just curious if he gets the same love and respect in the media and mainstream, if you will.

    6.2K6046431464K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202627x their median

    Awful stuff on the BKFC broadcast. Fighter tells his corner MULTIPLE times, I can’t see. I can’t see. Corner ignores him and just keeps saying, Do you want to keep fighting or not? He clearly didn’t. HE COULDN’T SEE, he said repeatedly. Seconds later … KO’d. Awful. Negligent. He should fire that corner.

    6.2K120818475K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202625x their median

    With how things were going at lightweight, Arman desperately needed to make a statement. Safe to say he delivered. https://t.co/7Dtb5QjYsx

    5.5K2656125218K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202624x their median

    Demetrious Johnson doubles down on why he believes the UFC is not a sport, pointing to the promotion's inconsistent treatment of fighters: "When I hear Dana say, 'We want to keep the best athletes on the planet,' then there's another side to it. 'They're not exciting'... You get to f*cking make the matches. They get to pick and choose what they want to do, which goes back to that one thing I said. It's not a sport, it's entertainment. Which is fine. Just say it's entertainment."

    5.2K2198218235K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#helwanishow#ufc333#ufc332#furyjoshua#mitb

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 360 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.466% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 30.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 360 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #helwanishow, #ufc333, #ufc332.

What is Ariel Helwani's engagement rate on X?
Ariel Helwani (@arielhelwani) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 360 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,411,023 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Ariel Helwani sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @arielhelwani have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @arielhelwani post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 30.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going