Back to @aramco's profile

aramco engagement report

@aramco - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.089%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.016%
7.7M views on a typical post
Reach
556.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
90 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7M times each, and 0.016% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 556.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

aramco's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.089%, aramco sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 251 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 21, 20267.5x their median

    Congratulations to the Saudi talent at the Aramco STEM Racing World Finals 2026! LYNX Racing claimed the World Champion title and the Best Team Identity award, while Team BAZ won Best Project Management and Fastest Car in the knockout stage To celebrate these outstanding achievements, both teams’ logos were showcased on two Aramco F4 Saudi Arabian Championship cars

    8.9K25434107.5M viewsView on X
  • Mar 30, 202643x their median

    As the title sponsor of the Formula 1® Aramco Japanese Grand Prix 2026, we are building on our long history of energy leadership, partnership, and investment in Japan https://t.co/4OAzdUhekt

    5.4K3913272167M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20265.0x their median

    Celebrating the next generation of football excellence Congratulations to Pau Cubarsí, winner of the FIFA Young Player Award presented by Aramco, as he received the award from H.E. Yasir Al-Rumayyan, Chairman of Aramco's Board of Directors https://t.co/PCNphIPo7A

    5.8K26070118.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20264.7x their median

    President and CEO, Amin Nasser, highlights the role of the Company’s resilience in reinforcing reliability and bolstering its financial strength, even under the most challenging economic conditions, while emphasizing the importance of people in translating these capabilities into genuine resilience

    5.2K406106821M viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 202612x their median

    The passion of football brings the world together once again We are proud to be a FIFA Major Worldwide Partner and the Global Energy Partner https://t.co/s0AUlFys05

    3.0K203152948M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.7x their median

    Our 2026 second-quarter and half-year financial results reflect our operational resilience and our business agility in adapting to regional developments while maintaining the quality of our performance

    2.9K266100859M viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 20263.7x their median

    We are proud to continue our strategic partnership with the World Robot Olympiad, aiming to empower young innovators to design, build, and program robots that solve real-world challenges https://t.co/rz8G6ov4rG

    2.8K218187737M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.1x their median

    Long before digital payroll, a simple machine helped count the coins that reached our employees Explore the story of the Roulomat

    2.3K17351745M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20262.0x their median

    As part of our commitment to inspiring the next generation of STEM leaders through motorsport, we delivered an immersive day of hands-on learning at Silverstone this weekend, in collaboration with our partners @AstonMartinF1 @F1 @STEMRacingHQ https://t.co/5xFGcl9qmZ

    2.2K1801101035M viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.0x their median

    From designing and building to competing on the global stage, the Aramco STEM Racing World Finals gave young minds an opportunity to put their skills and knowledge into action https://t.co/IQp0Q7l3pZ

    2.2K23943012M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7M times each, and 0.016% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 556.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.

What is aramco's engagement rate on X?
aramco (@aramco) has an engagement rate of 0.089%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,374,945 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.089%, aramco sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aramco have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aramco post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going