Back to @angeloinchina's profile

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 engagement report

@angeloinchina - 296K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.097%
of 296K followers
Per impression
3.16%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
286
interactions (median)
Saved
0.254%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 286 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 3.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bangladesh, #hindu.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #bangladesh, #hindu.

Compared with accounts its own size

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 583 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 18, 202653x their median

    FTANCE A few steps away from. Civil WAR https://t.co/cAwiPGdfBV

    11K3.2K366122682K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202652x their median

    Tensione in via Torino. Il poliziotto al giovane: "Che stai filmando?" https://t.co/HeJaHcP7ak

    12K1.6K4343201.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202627x their median

    🇫🇷 FRANCE: THIS IS MURDER. An unarmed medic was doing his job, trying to help people. Now he is dead, and the media are telling us he simply passed out and died. Are we seriously supposed to believe this and move on? The French media are downplaying what happened while a man who came to help others is no longer alive. PLEASE, DO NOT LOOK AWAY. This is France today. An unarmed medic should be able to do his job without fearing for his life. Someone must answer for this. The truth must come out. Those responsible must face justice.

    4.6K2.6K27211670K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202624x their median

    ALBANIANS ARE SHOOTING PROTESTORS WITH GUNS & TEAR GAS They are protesting the Israeli and Kushner take over of their country. FREE ALBANIA https://t.co/O0NFHngXuj

    4.8K1.8K10279144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202620x their median

    Ansar’Allah Cannot Be Beaten Not because of the missiles. Because of what they still have. These tribes have been fighting empires in those mountains for hundreds of years. Ottomans came and left. British came and left. Saudis came with American planes and still couldn’t finish the job. The land itself teaches you. Kids grow up knowing every hill and every path. They wear the same simple clothes their grandfathers wore. They walk in sandals and they know how to shoot. That’s not weakness. That’s memory. FAITH is real there. It’s why a young guy stands on a ridge with a rifle and doesn’t run when the jets come. Patriotism isn’t a speech. It’s just not letting outsiders take your home. Their culture says dying on your own land is better than living under someone else’s rules. The other side doesn’t have that. Princes fly to London and Geneva. Their soldiers get paid. Western armies sit in air-conditioned bases then go home and argue about other things. Their elites worry about money and old files. Look at the videos. Thousands of men walking through the dust with rifles. No fancy gear. No press people. Just numbers and the feeling that this land is theirs. Countries that forget what people will die for always lose to the ones who still remember. Ansar’Allah remembers.

    4.4K1.3K12662289K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202616x their median

    Bangladesh Colour Revolution: India Should Pay Attention. Yunus stood on a stage in New York with Bill Clinton and named Mahfuz Alam as the brain behind the revolution. His exact words: it was meticulously designed, it didn’t just come suddenly. Two years later, Neha Bora >> the student leader the NYT and BBC are now calling the face of India’s protests >> puts out a video thanking Bangladesh’s Gen Z for showing them the way. Same vocabulary. Same playbook. People keep asking if there’s a foreign hand. Yunus answered that question himself, on camera, in front of Clinton. India should really pay attention. What is happening right now in India is exactly the same colour revolution playbook.

    3.1K1.3K12283375K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202612x their median

    The House of SAUD will fall.

    2.9K356982956K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202611x their median

    This isn’t in Iran this is France. If it were Iran the US would send weapons in to make things worse. https://t.co/X6Xe32oo5y

    2.4K500811427K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.8x their median

    Hong Kong: what Western media didn’t want to hear I write this as Joshua Wong faces a possible life sentence for treason and colluding with foreign forces. The West is already preparing the halo. Spare me. In 2019 I stood at Tamar Square in Hong Kong and said what the cameras did not want to hear. This was not a “pro-democracy movement.” It was a US color-revolution attempt. NED, USAID, Soros networks, Western politicians and a handful of local proxies tried to turn a real extradition-bill dispute into chaos — smash the city, break One Country Two Systems, and use Hong Kong as a dagger against China. I lived it. I spoke against it. We fought the funded rioters who wanted the city in flames. Death threats followed. Fine. I was not there to please Western editors. Wong was never a student hero. He was a useful face for an “international battlefront”: lobby Pelosi, Rubio and the rest, beg for sanctions, invite foreign pressure on his own city. That is not dissent. That is inviting an empire into your house and calling it freedom. Collusion has a name. Now it has a courtroom. Color revolutions are not freedom. They are regime-change software. Same playbook every time: • hijack a genuine grievance • flood money, training, slogans, cameras • escalate from protest to violence • install a government that answers to Washington and the NGO machine • strip sovereignty and call it “values” Ukraine is the textbook. Maidan was sold as Europe and dignity. What it delivered was a captured state, NATO as religion, and a country turned into a proxy. That path led straight to war. A color revolution on a fault line does not “liberate.” It prepares the battlefield. Last year the same circus hit Nepal. Youth anger at corruption was real. Then Discord mobilization, burned ministries, a government toppled in days. And the usual clowns — self-proclaimed “China experts” — cheered like it was a festival. Why? Because they told the story people already wanted to hear. No research. No history of how these operations end. They wanted to look cool. They wanted views at the expense of truth. That is not analysis. That is content. With influence comes responsibility. They had the first and dumped the second. Look at Japan. Look at the Philippines. That is the finished product when the operation works: not always tanks in the streets — bases, treaties, media, a political class that treats US priorities as destiny. Tools of the empire. I cannot highlight this enough. These revolutions are evil because they steal the one thing a people must never outsource: the right to solve their own problems. Sovereignty is the foundation of any real democracy. Without it you get a flag, a parliament, and a foreign handler. Hong Kong 2019 was the warning. Ukraine was the cost. Nepal was the encore the pundits still applauded. Joshua Wong’s trial is the reminder that inviting foreign force against your own country is not activism. It is betrayal. May this era of meddling end. Self-determination. Peace. Mutual prosperity. Sovereignty above all.

    1.9K4641024873K viewsView on X
  • Jan 11, 20255.9x their median

    Want to know why Greenland has been kept : - very poor - under-developed - living out of welfare paid by Denmark (500 Million dollars per year. While it has trillions of dollars in mining, gas and oil.. Easy, same as the general strategy of the West in the Global South, use NGOs (climate change, diversity, human rights, animal protections) to completely block any developments. Those NGOs are mainly financed by the US, blackjack and other Wall Street vultures. This way the US can better control and influence the 50'000 people in Greenland by giving freebies through USAID to manipulate civil society, education. The idea for the US is to > - push for independence - once independent either strike a multi-billion dollar deal or by force if necessary. Basically pay thousand times less than what Greenland is worth. If people from Greenland were able to tap into their resources they would be by far the richest nation per capita on earth. Instead they are living out of social welfare, the same as native Indians were treated by the colonisers in the USA, give them survival money and alcohol and turn a proud nation into parasite, zombified nation. US leadership doesn't care about Greenland, it only sees trillions dollars of reserves, huge real estate asset and strategic land on the artic route.

    1.7K593744297K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bangladesh#hindu

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 286 interactions against 296K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 3.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 53x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bangladesh, #hindu.

What is Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹's engagement rate on X?
Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 (@angeloinchina) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 296,433 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @angeloinchina have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @angeloinchina post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going