(fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ engagement report
@ZaidBalll - 474K followers on X
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.245%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.
Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #copium.
Compared with accounts its own size
(fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.245%, (fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.695% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 71% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 25, 202461x their median
WHAT A PICTURE!ππ΄ https://t.co/jfPKKioYJl
- Sep 4, 20269.8x their median
Good riddance. https://t.co/gMnZSsE735
- Oct 21, 20268.4x their median
yeah Bruno is done out here πππ https://t.co/sdKyIe2odY
- Sep 5, 20267.3x their median
Β£332M on signings & canβt score a SINGLE goal in 3 premier league games.
- Aug 27, 20266.8x their median
π¨Manchester United will FACE Atletico Madrid AWAY!!!π https://t.co/N8bjxV3GqC
- Oct 22, 20266.2x their median
Wilcox doesnβt want Nagelsmann? That means he is ONE. BRING HIM TO THE THEATRE. https://t.co/KF3CAQv2zx
- Sep 5, 20266.1x their median
City are FOOD in transition. Weβll beat them next week.π
- Sep 6, 20266.0x their median
π¨πΈ - Michael Carrick SCREAMING from the dugout: βYouri, letβs keep the ball. Pass & Move!β https://t.co/DA2V0eIKTJ
- Aug 27, 20265.7x their median
Mazraoui - Bayern Munich De Ligt - Bayern Munich Bruno Fernandes - Sporting Lisbon Benjamin Sesko - RB Leipzig Matheus Cunha - RB Leipzig Returns for many of our players in the UCL.
- Sep 6, 20265.7x their median
πππππ https://t.co/d81Yp034IO
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 474K followers, an engagement rate of 0.245%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.
- What is (fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ's engagement rate on X?
- (fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ (@ZaidBalll) has an engagement rate of 0.245%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 473,535 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.245%, (fan) Zaid βπΌπΎπͺ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ZaidBalll have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ZaidBalll post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.