Back to @Windows's profile

Windows engagement report

@Windows - 8.1M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 8.1M followers
Per impression
1.61%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
0.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
945
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 945 interactions against 8.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,944 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.727% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 71x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Windows's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,944 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Windows sits above the 10th percentile of the 211,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.693%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 211,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,469 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.693%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202671x their median

    Stray Kids(스트레이 키즈) "FARMING" Video https://t.co/os6Cr4z60D Listen to “THIS &THAT” now🚚 https://t.co/r6X8izMK2D Listen to "This & That (This Remixes)" now⬅️ https://t.co/5jQmLMb7xH Listen to "This & That (That Remixes)" now➡️ https://t.co/0WGQPIT4c3 #StrayKids #스트레이키즈 #THIS_AND_THAT #FARMING #YouMakeStrayKidsStay

    47K17K5413.0K1.5M viewsView on X
  • May 29, 202641x their median

    A new era of PC. 25.0528, 121.5990

    38K1.7K2.8K1.5K7.8M viewsView on X
  • May 1, 202619x their median

    MacBook Neo vs Others Brand Laptop https://t.co/pjm9GOrvMf

    17K4394522065.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 202676x their median

    Introducing Surface Laptop Ultra. Built for world makers. Designed for what's next. The most powerful Surface laptop ever. Coming Fall 2026. Sign up to learn more: https://t.co/k8aEX2pTAy https://t.co/bY1NdzNnie

    12K1.2K55453012M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 202663x their median

    Your trip to Japan officially starts now. Forza Horizon 6 is here 🏎️ https://t.co/FYa4Q4QyQq

    9.6K837294501.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202611x their median

    Dang, lot of @Warcraft fans in chat. Here are some more beta cods:   F8MC-855P-BJGTJ-TQP6-4BX6   VS8R-TGC5-C35L6-49VK-TC8G   LL9F-DX98-P6DXG-RKCV-93BG   98MB-CDDN-8PWT8-HXRX-6MQW

    7.3K2932.7K741.3M viewsView on X
  • May 28, 202679x their median

    Go ahead, tap the Windows logo 🟦🟦 🟦🟦

    9.9K147134233.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202610x their median

    A faster, more responsive Windows experience is here. See what's new and what's coming next: https://t.co/fhucBms87N https://t.co/AkUotug1TV

    8.7K489447171831K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20267.4x their median

    2001 🤝 2026 Halo: Campaign Evolved is now available on all platforms! 🎮 https://t.co/4PxQl9QPwz https://t.co/Knb9tpqypB

    5.2K889800102417K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202637x their median

    Introducing - Surface RTX Spark Dev Box. All the power developers need, right out of the box. Sign up to learn more: https://t.co/DF0DvEvhOz Surface RTX Spark Dev Box. Built for more. https://t.co/wFqfi6z8FD

    5.8K5072042503.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 945 interactions against 8.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,944 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.727% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 71x its own typical post.

What is Windows's engagement rate on X?
Windows (@Windows) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 8,071,756 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Windows sits above the 10th percentile of the 211,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Windows have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,944 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Windows post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going