WhaleViewChart engagement report
@WhaleViewChart - 299K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
WhaleViewChart's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, WhaleViewChart sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 479 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 8, 20263.9x their median
mame-inu:native 已经有力地证明了自己的实力。从我最初关注时约 100 万美元的市值，一路攀升至 359 万美元的历史新高（ATH）。@mamebnb 0x39d9B36Aa0E7A1FEe97D6ff614420f7308ba7777 真正的关键在于，团队能否真正落实执行，将项目愿景转化为市场认可的价值。Koma 项目背后的开发者此前曾打造过估值达 2 亿美元的项目，这为 MAME 奠定了有趣的起点，但过往的成绩并不能自动保证未来的成功。 从 100 万美元涨至 359 万美元的走势表明，MAME 成功吸引了广泛关注，积聚了市场势能，并获得了市场的重新定价。曾经仅仅基于预期的投资逻辑，如今已得到了实际价格走势的有力印证。 这正是当前 MAME 局势引人注目的原因。它不再仅仅停留在“可能发生什么”的层面；当关注度、执行力和市场势能汇聚一堂时，MAME 已经向市场展示了其真正的潜力——市值从 100 万美元跃升至 359 万美元的历史新高。首轮考验已顺利通过。 接下来的焦点在于 MAME 如何在此基础上进一步发展，以及团队能否继续将关注度转化为更具影响力的叙事。市场已经给出了第一次回应，而书写下一篇章的重任，则掌握在 MAME 手中。
- Oct 19, 20263.1x their median
$VRAX（又称“指挥官 Vrax”）凭借其独特的品牌形象，以及在市场环境变迁中依然保持活跃的社区，在 Robinhood Chain 上备受关注。在瞬息万变的 Meme 币领域，鲜明的身份标识有助于项目脱颖而出；VRAX 通过塑造一个核心角色，为其叙事构建了清晰的焦点。@VraxCTO 该项目的发展历程并非一帆风顺。在经历市值大幅缩水后，VRAX 实现了强劲反弹，这充分体现了 Meme 币市场中情绪转变之迅速。这种剧烈波动反映了“注意力驱动型”资产的不稳定性——社区参与度和市场兴趣的回升，能够直接影响外界对该项目的认知。 VRAX 之所以值得关注，在于它既拥有令人印象深刻的品牌形象，又能在市场环境更迭中始终保持话题热度。在低迷时期维持活跃的社区，有助于保持项目的曝光度；而重获的增长势头，则可能为生态系统吸引新的参与者。 当然，强劲的反弹并不意味着上涨势头一定会持续。VRAX 的后续表现，将取决于社区活动的持续性、市场需求，以及其叙事能否在 Robinhood Chain 上继续吸引关注。 0x94641b97010608C3827fB058074889f19868FF33 “指挥官 Vrax”此前已历经挫折与关注度的回升。眼下，关键在于 VRAX 未来将如何演进，以及能否在已重获的关注度基础上进一步发展。
- Oct 2, 20262.3x their median
$EMBER 凭借其鲜明的特质以及在市场上引发的强烈反响，自然而然地吸引了人们的目光。尽管围绕它的讨论有时更多集中在炒作、话题性事件和争议上，而非实际的项目进展，但 EMBER 确立自身地位的方式确实独树一帜。 合约地址 (CA)：5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 EMBER 的独特之处在于，它能在竞争日益激烈的加密货币领域保持极高的辨识度。随着时间的推移，其叙事风格形成了独特的个性，为社区提供了超越那些昙花一现的热点之外、值得深入探讨与挖掘的内容。@embercurve 在无数项目竞相争夺关注度的市场环境中，拥有鲜明的特质往往能带来显著优势。EMBER 已在舆论场中占据了一席之地，而其不断演变的发展历程也使其成为一个值得持续关注的项目。
- Sep 10, 20262.3x their median
🚨 $PENPE × $AAPL 现已上线。 Robinhood 刚刚开启了大门。 接下来，市场将决定走向何方。🍎🔥 0xb83fc6010c8dcf628abe787a161c619fcc543117 https://t.co/FzrgyDg5Vp
- Jul 31, 20262.1x their median
$INDEX 的下一个 Catalysts（利好催化剂），是成为 Pons V2 上新代币发射的 Pairing Asset（配对交易对资产）。 双方已经官宣了集成合作关系。@MEADGod 提到过针对 @theindexfi 这类集成合作伙伴的“期权税（Options tax）”机制。我虽然还不完全确定具体的运作细节，但它绝对能为 Holders 创造额外价值。随着越来越多的新代币与 INDEX 进行配对，它们也将间接获得这种“股票背书（Stock-backed）”的叙事曝光。因此，随着 INDEX 的壮大，这些项目的价值也会同步增强。 创作者们（Creators）将有极强的动力去 Hold INDEX，因为它在链上不断 Accumulate（积累）美股资产。而即便他们选择卖出，产生交易量（Volume）依然会印钞反哺那些坚守的 Holders。 这就是“美股印钞引擎”（Stock-printing engine）的底层运作逻辑。🚀 0x56910D4409F3a0C78C64DD8D0545FF0705389870
- Sep 18, 20261.8x their median
在当前的市场回调中 $BATON 似乎是一个值得关注的机会。尽管价格有所回落，但 BATON 依然活跃在热门榜单上，这表明市场关注度并未减退。当某个代币在市场降温期间仍能保持曝光度时，往往意味着其社区和交易活动仍在支撑着该项目的热度。@batononpumpfun 这种回调阶段往往是下一轮行情悄然蓄势的时期。如果 BATON 能继续保持势头、交易量和曝光度，一旦买盘重新介入，很可能会迅速迎来更强劲的突破。 Hg5Ja55T5wESq4vyFoiVCMeHXtGyVA69X2UHq8hgpump 目前的市场格局颇具看点，关注度依然在线，其走势图表值得密切留意。趁 BATON 还处于这一区间时，切勿忽视它。
- Oct 12, 20261.6x their median
solana:8nnaeWCw8mUypcGAgbmSuzAT85uWx4UN12adDrMhXrGF 开局强劲，在正式上线后迅速崭露头角。尽管尚处于起步阶段，该项目已确立了明确的发展方向：致力于实现自动化的链上交易，并围绕易用性、高效性和更智能的执行机制构建其愿景。 HOTBOT 的独特之处在于，它力求让交易自动化变得更加平易近人。该项目不再要求用户手动管理每一个环节，而是通过一系列旨在简化交易流程的工具，帮助用户更系统地应对瞬息万变的加密货币市场。 早期的发展势头固然值得关注，但项目上线后的后续走向更为关键。对于 HOTBOT 而言，当前阶段正是通过产品开发、用户采纳和社区互动来塑造其长期定位的时刻。随着越来越多的人了解并使用该平台，明确的愿景将为项目的持续发展奠定坚实基础。@usehotbot 合约地址 (CA)：8nnaeWCw8mUypcGAgbmSuzAT85uWx4UN12adDrMhXrGF 随着加密货币用户不断寻求管理交易策略及参与链上市场的新途径，自动化交易领域持续受到关注。HOTBOT 瞄准这一增长领域，随着平台的不断演进，有望在生态系统中确立其独特的地位。 强劲的开局仅仅是个开始，而非终点。HOTBOT 已带着明确的方向正式进入市场，其后续进展值得密切关注。
- Oct 6, 20261.5x their median
$SWORDCAT 正在让市场重新见识到，真正的 Meme 币“心智份额”（mindshare）究竟是何模样。当市场长时间忽视某个叙事后，一旦注意力突然回流，往往就是行情爆发力最强的时候。@catwifswordsoll 5tCju6YNxHq5zrA6tGndr6F7TK42mpUFmeE31cSFpump SWORDCAT 的独特之处在于它构建自身认知度的方式。在无数代币争夺有限注意力的市场环境中，拥有一个令人印象深刻的角色、故事和社群，往往能带来巨大的差异化优势。 当前的局势为 SWORDCAT 提供了再次吸引市场目光的契机。每一次回调都成为市场关注的焦点，而不断提升的曝光度则能积聚动能，将一个相对沉寂的 Meme 转化为引发广泛热议的话题。 Meme 币的价值远不止于K线图。心智份额至关重要，社群活力至关重要，认知度同样至关重要。SWORDCAT 充分证明了，当市场开始寻觅下一个重大叙事时，一个令人难忘的 Meme 依然能够持续吸引关注。
- Aug 5, 20261.5x their median
市场往往青睐那些适时出现的叙事。随着人们的目光重回 Meme 币（模因币），那些形象简单、辨识度高的项目往往更容易获得社区的持续关注。 solana:6oGuFDbEeaSzTcvrmmd2MqfNYwHKXFoN7regcR22pump 似乎正受益于这一趋势。@NeegyOfficial CA: 6oGuFDbEeaSzTcvrmmd2MqfNYwHKXFoN7regcR22pump NEEGY 并非依赖复杂的背景故事，而是围绕一个通俗易懂且易于传播的 Meme 建立起来的。鉴于社交平台上的讨论热点往往围绕着能引发共鸣的网络文化，该项目能够自然地融入现有的热门叙事之中，而无需费力从零开始构建新概念。 项目的增长同样取决于社区能否在初期的关注热潮过后保持发展势头。随着越来越多的参与者发现并投身其中，该项目的知名度通过自发的讨论和社区驱动的内容创作不断提升。这种“适时的叙事”与“日益增长的参与度”相结合，为项目生态系统的持续扩张奠定了坚实基础，尤其是在市场情绪回暖的背景下。
- Jul 25, 20261.5x their median
随着越来越多的 me/目光 转向 Solana 上的 Gemini/新兴项目， $KET 正在 Latent/蓄势发力。 K 线图 shows/显示出强劲 signal/信号，如果买盘压力持续增加，这绝对是未来几天值得密切关注的标的。 目前依然处于早期，对于追踪低市值（Low-cap）机会的人来说，盈亏比（Risk-to-reward）非常吸引人。 CA: 9Pfync3ejPC9eHqVzq3nYQJAhyhjqpnB9UsaSfLxpump
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.9K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 54 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.
- What is WhaleViewChart's engagement rate on X?
- WhaleViewChart (@WhaleViewChart) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,623 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, WhaleViewChart sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WhaleViewChart have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WhaleViewChart post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.