Back to @Wealth_Pill's profile

Lewin | Wealth Pill πŸ’Š engagement report

@Wealth_Pill - 430K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.045%
of 430K followers
Per impression
0.245%
79K views on a typical post
Reach
18.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.27/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 79K times each, and 0.245% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Lewin | Wealth Pill πŸ’Š sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 626 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 18, 202613x their median

    https://t.co/OTLFKcqkzq

    1.9K31036472.1M viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 202510x their median

    Normalize this by age 30. 1. Talk slow 2. Be clear 3. Never mumble 4. Don't interrupt If you want to improve your communication skills, read this...

    1.7K19440296K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20268.9x their median

    71.6% of small business owners have filmed a video for their business and never posted it. 53.9% said it didn't look professional enough. 48.6% hated how they looked. We asked 1,000+ owners what happens when an AI avatar shows up for them. Full report: https://t.co/wqXVIEgaiN https://t.co/R0bQC5t6vl

    615332502275706K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.9x their median

    A Chinese robot just performed a flying side kick, a sword fight, and a fencing match. with no CGI or pre-programmed scripts. I made a video breaking it down with my honest takeaway… These are Kung Fu moves that take martial artists years to perfect. A machine just did them on camera, in real time, with the same precision as a trained human. The company behind this is called AGIBOT. They're based in Shanghai, and here is the number I keep coming back to…AGIBOT shipped roughly 15,000 humanoid robots in the first half of 2026. That's more than every Western robotics company combined. The @AGIBOT_A3 Ultra is the commercial version. 700 TOPS of compute. LiDAR, surround-view cameras, dual depth sensors. It sees 360 degrees, positions itself within one centimeter accuracy, and predicts risks three meters ahead. It's designed to work 24/7 in factories, hotels, retail stores, and patrol routes. AGIBOT now controls 44% of the global humanoid robotics market. They're certified in China, the US, and Europe. Their robots can coordinate in swarms of over 100 units at once.

    566926343554K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    $70M+ in ad spend is already supported by Hypesonic. Today we're officially introducing it: the world's most powerful self-improving ads and content engine. It reads your ad data, competitors, what's viral, does deep research on your customers. Then it creates image and video ads the data says will win, and launches them. RT + Comment "Hypesonic" and we'll send over one week free access.

    119357530136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    The hidden fact.. AI agents don’t prove themselves by answering questions. They prove themselves by getting real work done. That’s why @Accio_official CommerceAgentBench stands out: 107 real-world tasks built around actual e-commerce workflows. Procurement, listings, operations, fulfillment, after-sales the whole journey. The next generation of AI benchmarks should measure execution, not just intelligence.

    841627323K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Astra for Sales: Frontier intelligence built for your pipeline. A new offering from Origami powered by GPT-6 Astra with tools, settings, and context to help teams find the right companies, reach the right people, and turn outbound into revenue. https://t.co/gFOJzbOjRj

    3672496.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    I gave @gmi_cloud Router the same session with 3 very different tasks: β†’ Sales trend analysis β†’ API/caching math problem β†’ JavaScript performance bug All in Balanced mode. Instead of sending everything to one frontier model, GMI Router split the workload across 3 different models: Qwen3.7-Max β†’ sales trend analysis GPT-5.6-Luna β†’ API/caching math DeepSeek-V4-Flash β†’ JavaScript performance The router has 21 eligible models to choose from, and the selection happens per request based on the task, quality target, and cost. The cost difference was small per prompt but meaningful at scale: ~$0.02–$0.03 saved per prompt compared with running the same work on Claude Opus 4.8. Across thousands of requests, those small differences can add up quickly. I also like that you can choose what the router optimizes for: β†’ Quality β€” prioritize the highest quality, then cheapest model that reaches it β†’ Balanced β€” strong quality/cost tradeoff β†’ Cost β€” minimize spend while keeping practical intelligence And you can see the selected model + routing metadata for each request. The takeaway: Different tasks don't necessarily need the same model. Instead of paying frontier-model prices by default, let the workload determine where each request should go. @GMI_Cloud #AI #LLM #AIAgents

    2721036.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 430K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 79K times each, and 0.245% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Lewin | Wealth Pill πŸ’Š's engagement rate on X?
Lewin | Wealth Pill πŸ’Š (@Wealth_Pill) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 430,028 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Lewin | Wealth Pill πŸ’Š sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Wealth_Pill have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Wealth_Pill post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going