Back to @WEEI's profile

WEEI engagement report

@WEEI - 164K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.01%
of 164K followers
Per impression
0.412%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
2.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #patriots, #drakemaye.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #nfl, #patriots, #drakemaye.

Compared with accounts its own size

WEEI's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, WEEI sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,674 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,407 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 201 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202666x their median

    Romeo Doubs, who had a career-high 96 receiving yards today, including a career-long 63-yard reception: “I thought today was productive… I look forward to continuously improving.” https://t.co/j9UZfgIcv7

    1.0K1524642K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202611x their median

    New England falls short in Chicago, 30-24. Instant reaction to the loss? WHO IS TO BLAME? Did Williams outplay Maye? Were the Patriots outcoached? Thoughts on the defense? Curtis: "That stadium was unbelievable" #Patriots #NFL #fyp https://t.co/BsGd8bRmPT

    15671606.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202610x their median

    After a poor performance on Sunday, A.J. Brown again had little impact on last night’s game. The guys discuss their A.J. Brown worry meter. On a scale of 1 - 10, how worried are you? @KenLairdWEEI @teddyjradio @heyrichhey https://t.co/6YiswSGpjv

    118103279.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20269.9x their median

    The Red Sox are officially IN! https://t.co/B4cKRhaNeV

    13323204.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20269.0x their median

    Drake Maye on the feeling after winning a game where the offense wasn’t at its best: “You’ve got to kind of see it both ways. You’ve got to be excited and enjoy the win, but at the same time, you’ve got to realize that playing like this offensively isn’t going to end up with us leading our team to wins.”

    13382111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20266.8x their median

    Caleb Williams CLEARLY outplayed Drake Maye last night https://t.co/CilVyvSPsX

    6973039.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20264.5x their median

    Caleb Williams vs. Drake Maye: Same draft class, two completely different worlds. Curtis: "Each landed in the proper place". Did each team land a generational talent? Higher ceiling? #NFL #CalebWilliams #DrakeMaye #Bears #Patriots https://t.co/CYbJI2txBI

    5821207.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20263.9x their median

    COMPLETE TEAM? @TheKostos: "I think they're (Patriots) better this year, than they were last year, when they went to the Super Bowl" Host of @YouBetterYouBet, Nick Kostos joins! Do Patriots have a better chance at making the Super Bowl than Bears? #NFL #Patriots #DrakeMaye https://t.co/RHKDTGQMy9

    553505.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20263.9x their median

    WEEI reporter and host Justin Turpin joined Rich, Ken, and Ted to discuss last night’s Patriots loss to the Bears and talked about the explosive plays the defense let up. And the numbers are eye opening. @KenLairdWEEI @teddyjradio @heyrichhey https://t.co/yX2datGSLa

    563305.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20263.9x their median

    CAP?? Jayson Tatum discusses when he first heard Jaylen Brown had been dealt. What do you make of JT's comments and JB's 🧢 reply? #JaysonTatum #JaylenBrown #Celtics #NBA https://t.co/Y36vqPEDwl

    4261139.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nfl#patriots#drakemaye#fyp#nhl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 66x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nfl, #patriots, #drakemaye.

What is WEEI's engagement rate on X?
WEEI (@WEEI) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 163,546 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, WEEI sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WEEI have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WEEI post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going