Victoria Hayes engagement report
@VictoriaAlpha_ - 447K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 944 times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.211% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 449 interactions, about 90x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crypto, #bitcoin, #btc.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #crypto, #bitcoin, #btc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Victoria Hayes's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, Victoria Hayes sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 200 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 13, 202690x their median
$BTC Relief Rally Is Over. $60K Loading. https://t.co/TwLXE0Wduv
- Jul 3, 202681x their median
$ETH Pull the trigger above $1800. Do absolutely nothing before then. I'll happily pay higher once ETH clears a level stacked with both range resistance and the double top neckline. But I'm not paying a dime below that threshold. https://t.co/8tEAyYBjF8
- Aug 13, 202611x their median
Beautiful ๐คฉ ๐ https://t.co/KpUe8KRrYI
- Oct 9, 20266.0x their median
Bitcoin bounced from around $80.3K and is now back above $82K. The 4H chart still looks weak after repeated rejection at $87K and the loss of $83.5K. Iโm watching $83.5K now. Reclaiming it would be the first sign of strength. If BTC fails to recover and loses $80.3K, $79.5K https://t.co/t48J4gJXTT
- Oct 9, 20265.0x their median
$ETH 2025 ๐ค $ETH 2026 The pump was the same. The dump is happening too. Once it's over, the next leg up will start. https://t.co/QGIYkFjT4R
- Oct 9, 20265.0x their median
BOUGHT $JASMY BOTTOM IS IN! MCap $234M Sector: IoT & Data Economy Chart looks fire ๐ฅ Low volume - Iโm ready for a large expansion First Monthly target 323% gains Do you see what I see? https://t.co/bW1dEJIuWV
- Oct 10, 20264.5x their median
$SOL โ 10% pullback to $109 context โ well above the green zone, no retest needed yet the ladder โ$166 at the descending line, the fight beyond it โ $378 invalidation โ losing the green zone #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #BTC #Ethereum #ETH #CryptoTrading #CryptoNews #sol https://t.co/HY3zfRrulS
- Oct 9, 20264.5x their median
$AVAX really followed our plan $10.50 was the level broke it, held it, and now weโre pushing higher $15 next? https://t.co/2ncxEVzKrh
- Oct 9, 20264.5x their median
๐จ BITCOIN ANALYST PREDICTING THE FUTURE ๐ Scenario for $BTC: ๐ First, the weak hands get shaken out. ๐ฐ Those selling in fear get flushed from the market. ๐ Then, the strong hands step in. #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #Altcoin #CryptoTwitter #BullRun #Crypto https://t.co/jrkkfIVw15
- Oct 9, 20264.5x their median
Bitcoin is STILL above $81,000 I remain extremely bullish on a rally to $100k SEND IT!! https://t.co/J7gjTab0Fx
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 944 times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.211% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 449 interactions, about 90x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crypto, #bitcoin, #btc.
- What is Victoria Hayes's engagement rate on X?
- Victoria Hayes (@VictoriaAlpha_) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 446,663 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, Victoria Hayes sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VictoriaAlpha_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VictoriaAlpha_ post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.