Vic Lombardi engagement report
@VicLombardi - 174K followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 178x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #broncoscountry, #colts.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #broncos, #broncoscountry, #colts.
Compared with accounts its own size
Vic Lombardi's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.159%, Vic Lombardi sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 30% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 18, 2026178x their median
Just got off the phone with Aqib Talib…happy we were able to work thru our differences https://t.co/0gQt0n5BFs
- Sep 16, 202682x their median
Bo Nix had an Average Depth of Target of 3.86 yards in week 1. For reference: the average American watches TV from about 3.67 yards away. https://t.co/YBwtJ5Ci39
- Oct 16, 202621x their median
The fact this game is going to overtime is criminal. It’s a criminal act by the Broncos offense. They had SEVEN possessions in the second half for a grand total of 24 yards. Think about that.
- Oct 18, 202614x their median
I have no idea how this isn't DPI, but BYU has defeated No. 2 Notre Dame: https://t.co/x62SqOyd2U
- Sep 16, 202610x their median
Travis Kelce wasn't messing around pre-game ahead of MNF against the Broncos #ChiefsKingdom | #BroncosCountry https://t.co/16fW5yVWpz
- Oct 17, 20264.5x their median
🤔 https://t.co/rrw6yx5e8A
- Oct 16, 20263.5x their median
Do NOT blame the Denver defense. This game would be over if the offense could muster any sort of a drive. Last six possessions have amassed 33 yards total. Time to deliver. 14-11 @broncos
- Oct 18, 20263.4x their median
What a game. What a finish. Well deserved by BYU. Now that’s a righteous storming of the field!!
- Oct 18, 20262.7x their median
Where I come from, Notre Dame has one second left…
- Oct 18, 20261.9x their median
Colorado played a helluva game tonight. Gave Utah all it could handle.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 178x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #broncoscountry, #colts.
- What is Vic Lombardi's engagement rate on X?
- Vic Lombardi (@VicLombardi) has an engagement rate of 0.159%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 173,813 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.159%, Vic Lombardi sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VicLombardi have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VicLombardi post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.