Back to @UnaNoviaLoca's profile

La Tóxica engagement report

@UnaNoviaLoca - 327K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 327K followers
Per impression
0.064%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 327K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.064% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 69038x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Tóxica's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, La Tóxica sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 122 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 31, 202269038x their median

    se acuerdan cuando tinkerbell se estaba muriendo porque no le estaban dando atencion? ahora la entiendo https://t.co/ixgR7H16Lu

    58K9.9K1851.4KView on X
  • Jun 18, 20161716x their median

    Ciudad de México vs maestros. Algo está muy mal https://t.co/qFcFingSlT

    19K7.1K1.1K1.5KView on X
  • Feb 15, 202641x their median

    Soñé que Max Verstappen se iba al muro en la Q1 del GP de Australia. https://t.co/8aHEf9alvX

    596262745465K viewsView on X
  • Feb 9, 20262.9x their median

    Está reina merecía estar en el show del #SuperBowlLX https://t.co/4Fv6jek8Kt

    408103.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202640x their median

    Me puse perfume de hombre por error y ya llevo 19 mentiras.

    314418.4K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 20261.9x their median

    Normalicemos el MIGAJEO, ya sé que me dejó en visto desde hace 3 días pero le quiero contar algo.

    282023.3K viewsView on X
  • Jan 20, 20261.5x their median

    Si no es para ti, te va a doler todos los días hasta que lo entiendas.

    248003.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202621x their median

    Tu codo ya aparece en mis historias, no la cagues, porfa.

    172028.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202621x their median

    ¿Quien hace mejor pareja? Tom&Zendaya Tom&Sadie https://t.co/pTvFxro1YR

    1712112K viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 2026

    Siento que la vida me está diciendo “¡Quiere llorar!, ¡quiere llorar!” y pues sí, sí quiero.

    135112.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 327K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.064% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.481% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 69038x its own typical post.

What is La Tóxica's engagement rate on X?
La Tóxica (@UnaNoviaLoca) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 327,050 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, La Tóxica sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UnaNoviaLoca have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UnaNoviaLoca post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going