Mr. Anderson engagement report
@Truecrypto - 245K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Mr. Anderson's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.048%, Mr. Anderson sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 27% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 377 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 202522x their median
Everyone screaming “this move has just begun” is ignoring reality. #Bitcoin bottomed in November 2022. Since then, it’s already done an 8x. We are not at the start. We are much, much closer to the end. If we’re lucky, there are one or two more glorious pushes left. But that’s it. This is the stage where traders either: -lock in legacy gains, or =get drunk on euphoria and hand it all back. The truth? The bear always comes. And when it does, it won’t be a dip. It’ll be a 12-month purge designed to rug every late believer. So settle down. Get serious. Mark your invalidations. Respect your levels. Be ready to seize the subsequent one or two runs… Enjoy whatever form of Alt-season we get and then brace yourself. Because when the rug finally gets pulled, only disciplined traders will survive the dark side of this cycle.
- Jun 25, 20269.4x their median
bitcoin:native $60K BTC If you wanted a long term position close your eyes and Buy right now. Stash it away in cold storage. Same advice still holds 10x later. https://t.co/xKpGFHhz49
- Sep 3, 20264.3x their median
This dude called the Bitcoin bottom on June 11 while BTC was still sitting around $60K. And the whole thought process is on video. His own 12-month bear thesis said it was too early. The narrative said lower. He hates double bottoms. and still he said, “I have to trust my eyes.” Then he spent 8½ minutes showing exactly why. If you trade, watch this. https://t.co/NtQ1Wp7ooo
- Sep 24, 20262.8x their median
https://t.co/R6ZdOqASNd
- Sep 22, 20262.1x their median
One of the most important trading quotes I ever read changed the way I looked at why traders lose, and I think most people miss what it’s actually saying. The idea is basically this… Losing traders want different results. Winning traders are willing to become different people. Most people want the better strategy. The better indicator. The better market. The better mentor. Anything that lets them keep thinking, reacting, and behaving exactly the same while somehow getting a completely different result. But if you overtrade because you can’t sit still, another setup won’t fix you. If you move your stop because you hate being wrong, another indicator won’t fix you. If you chase because watching a move happen without you drives you crazy, the problem isn’t on the chart. The problem is sitting in the chair. At some point you have to be willing to say, “The person making these decisions is producing these results. Something in me has to change.” That might mean more patience. Less ego. Better emotional control. Learning to do absolutely nothing when there’s nothing to do. Following your process when every part of you wants to abandon it. Changing yourself isn’t what happens after you become successful. Being willing to change is part of how you become successful. That’s true far beyond trading. A lot of people spend years asking for a different life while protecting the same habits, excuses, and behaviors that built the one they already have. Sometimes the breakthrough isn’t finding something new. It’s finally becoming someone capable of producing a different result.
- Sep 23, 20262.0x their median
Rich people buy time, Poor people sell time. Rich people sell distractions, Poor people buy distractions. Rich people buy skills, Poor people buy entertainment. Rich people invest in growth, Poor people invest in comfort. Rich people plan for the future, Poor people live for the moment.
- Sep 3, 20261.9x their median
How are all those "Bart" charts looking right now? They sure were popular. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/c6q8lWJ2Fi
- Sep 9, 20261.7x their median
You don’t realize how much energy unreliable people cost you until you deal with someone who just does what they said they’d do. No chasing them. No checking behind them. No wondering which part of the story they left out. Reliable people give you part of your brain back.
- Sep 5, 20261.7x their median
A Saturday that feels completely ordinary to you is part of your kids’ childhood. Breakfast. Car rides. Sitting on the couch. “Dad, watch this” for the fifth time. They don’t need every weekend to be unforgettable. They need you present enough that the ordinary ones become the memories.
- Sep 23, 2026
WYCKOFF CLIFF NOTES 🧵👇 Most traders don’t struggle because they lack tools. They struggle because they don’t know which evidence matters. They memorize the picture, name every event, then try to make live price fit something they already studied. Start simpler. Who is in control? Is that control getting stronger or weaker? What did price just try to do, and did it succeed? Technical analysis is detective work. The labels are only shorthand. The footprints are the point. 1/8
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is Mr. Anderson's engagement rate on X?
- Mr. Anderson (@Truecrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 244,756 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.048%, Mr. Anderson sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Truecrypto have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Truecrypto post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.