Back to @TheEXECUTlONER_'s profile

๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ engagement report

@TheEXECUTlONER_ - 299K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 299K followers
Per impression
2.61%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
81
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 2.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 31% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 155K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, ๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 351 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 18, 202520x their median

    After having Caitlin Clarkโ€™s back, everyone will know who Sophie Cunningham is now. ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/Z9LtdyOfZc

    144K7.5K2.6K57712M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026172x their median

    The calories werenโ€™t the problem. Her hair was. https://t.co/mG8UyePg7i

    13K980248832.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026128x their median

    Thomas Massie has been in office 13 years, 10 months, and 3 days. He sat through Obama, Trump, Biden, and Trump again. He never filed impeachment articles. Think about thatโ€”during Obama and Biden, he never filed articles of impeachment. ๐Ÿ˜ณ Then he lost his primary. Suddenly Thomas Massie discovered high crimes and misdemeanors. Timing is a hell of a principle.

    6.6K2.8K81718751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202666x their median

    Hope yโ€™all have a Good Saturday and great Labor Day weekend. On another note, my brothers & I had to put my Dad in hospice last night. I kindly ask, if you could, to keep my Dad, Allen, in your prayers ๐Ÿ™. Iโ€™ve always believed in the power of prayer. He doesnโ€™t have much longer. TYIA ๐Ÿค

    3.5K6271.2K66102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202618x their median

    This is a tired, sleepy little girl. She played hard today chasing all those squirrels and chewing on sticks today. ๐Ÿ˜‚ She needed some body rubs after her long day. Thatโ€™s Dadโ€™s baby right there. https://t.co/AYysENEwpM

    1.3K12358113K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20268.8x their median

    I am willing to endure the inflation under Trump if it means Iran doesnโ€™t have Nuclear capabilities and it means other countries are paying more in tariffs like we have been subjected to. For far too long, President after President, they all talked a tough game when it came to Iran. From Carter to Reagan, from elder Bush to younger Bush, from Clinton to Obama to Biden, they all talked a tough game but never did anything about it. President Trump is the only one to back up his talk when it comes to Iran. As far as the tariffs, for decades other countries have been taking advance of the U.S. and charging us way more than we have been charging them. How is that fair? Yes, Iโ€™m willing to pay more. You bet!

    4092188164.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.7x their median

    Tank didnโ€™t seem too happy with me today. I sneezed kind of loud and he doesnโ€™t like loud noises. Heโ€™s walked away after that. Heโ€™s like really Dad? https://t.co/JfwR0pFrbS

    365485207.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20264.6x their median

    Hey @grok, if you had to choose one state to live the rest of your life in (pretending you are a real human) what state would you pick and why?

    28723593585K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20263.7x their median

    Happy 33rd birthday Charlie Kirk! ๐ŸŽ‚ Taken from us too soon but never to be forgotten. https://t.co/SneGcXzi8J

    212751213.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20262.9x their median

    Hey @grok, if you had to estimate how corrupt our government is by a percentage number, what would the percentage be?

    1464737180K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 81 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 2.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 31% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 155K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is ๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ's engagement rate on X?
๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ (@TheEXECUTlONER_) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,657 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, ๐Ÿ‘‰M-ร›-R-ฤŒ-H๐Ÿ‘ˆ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TheEXECUTlONER_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TheEXECUTlONER_ post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going