Back to @The6_2sharkkk's profile

ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’ engagement report

@The6_2sharkkk - 80K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 80K followers
Per impression
3.52%
795 views on a typical post
Reach
1.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.126%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 795 times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 2514x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nofap, #ē¾žč¾±.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #nofap, #ē¾žč¾±.

Compared with accounts its own size

ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’'s engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’ sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,186 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,400 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20262514x their median

    Imagine hooking up with someone and the next day they publish this on Substack https://t.co/rjS9DGLlD7

    66K3.5K1536171.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026616x their median

    https://t.co/7hDbfWyh8G

    16K1.1K8488380K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026379x their median

    E no get the kind suffering Nigerians no fit adapt to. useless fools Gambia no get light for 48hours and them don comot protest chai

    8.4K2.1K8055409K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202636x their median

    This was from Christmas https://t.co/dzSGpw7YvQ

    9047820045K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    I love touching myself I love relapsing I love porn I love gooning to porn overnight

    29320795 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    I can’t sleep, this is the 4th time I’ve touched myself since last night till this morning.

    27150880 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Honestly, I don’t crave sex. I crave being home alone with a lot of weed, a fully charged phone, and nothing but porn to keep me gooning all day.

    22240613 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Twitterć‚’é–‹ć„ćŸēž¬é–“ć€ć‚ćć“ćŒćƒ ć‚ŗćƒ ć‚ŗć—å§‹ć‚ć‚‹šŸ˜­ ä½“ćŒćŖć‚“ć ć‹å¤‰ćŖę„Ÿć˜ć«ćŖć£ć¦ć€č‡Ŗåˆ†ć§č§¦ć‚‰ćŖć„ćØč½ć”ē€ć‹ćŖć„ć€‚

    20230724 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    But why does porn addiction feel so good? I touch myself so good sometimes, and I start crying from how good it is.

    17220843 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    I have never gone #NoFap because I love fapping. I love staying in bed alone, just rubbing on my pussy until my fingers are soaked of my vagina fluid

    14310749 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nofap#ē¾žč¾±

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 795 times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 2514x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nofap, #ē¾žč¾±.

What is ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’'s engagement rate on X?
ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’ (@The6_2sharkkk) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 80,326 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, ObsessedwithmytittiesšŸ’ sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @The6_2sharkkk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @The6_2sharkkk post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going