Back to @SuckerCarlson's profile

Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ engagement report

@SuckerCarlson - 77K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 77K followers
Per impression
1.15%
436 views on a typical post
Reach
0.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 436 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.568% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 12948x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 202612948x their median

    Cet automne, pour la première fois depuis 250 ans, ma famille ne récoltera pas d'olives au Liban. Nos 600 oliviers ont été arrachés du sol par l'armée israélienne, racines comprises, et emportés. Les plus vieux avaient 500 ans ! Cette terre, mon grand-père la tenait de son arrière-grand-père. En deux siècles et demi, ma famille a acheté de la terre. Elle n'en a jamais vendu un mètre, pas un seul jour. Chez nous, on ne construit pas sur la terre. On y plante. Ces arbres ont survécu à plusieurs guerres. Ils ont survécu à tout. Regardez les deux photos. À gauche, notre terre le 25 juin, la veille de la signature de l'accord entre le Liban et Israël. À droite, la même terre le 20 juillet. Il ne reste rien. Et c’est justement ça, la preuve. Un incendie laisse des troncs noirs debout. Une frappe laisse des cratères. Ici, pas un tronc calciné, pas une souche, pas un débris. Une terre nue, raclée, griffée par les chenilles des engins. Déterrer un olivier de 500 ans sans le tuer demande des pelleteuses, un savoir-faire, des camions et une destination. Ce n’est pas un dégât de guerre. C’est une opération, sur une terre où il n’y avait ni armes, ni combattants, ni présence militaire. Ma famille n'a jamais été liée de près ou de loin au Hezbollah, et elle ne le sera jamais. Il n'y avait que des arbres, et des gens qui les taillent depuis huit générations. D'après les témoignages qui nous parviennent, ces arbres auraient été emportés de l'autre côté de la frontière, vers Israël. L'accord signé entre le Liban et Israël, censé préparer la paix, protège les biens des civils. Je demande simplement qu'il soit appliqué : que le sort des arbres déterrés soit établi, que ceux qui sont encore vivants soient rendus. Si nos arbres sont vivants quelque part, ils peuvent revenir. Je ne cherche pas une vengeance. Je cherche une adresse ! J'ai hésité à écrire ces lignes, pour ne pas provoquer des réactions d'un côté comme de l'autre. Mais je refuse de faire le deuil de ces oliviers. Dans ces arbres vit l'âme de mon grand-père, ancien général de la police libanaise, un homme qui a toujours cru dans la paix, dans les humains et dans la lumière. Il taillait ces arbres à mains nues. Il répétait : “on ne vend pas la terre, on la transmet” Je lui dois de ne pas me taire.

    43K20K9137201.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20261723x their median

    There you go https://t.co/g5FVdSrAC5

    7.4K9292245977K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026322x their median

    Notre pays traverse une saison de feux inédite : 116 085 hectares ont déjà brûlé et 13 566 départs de feu ont été recensés depuis janvier. Nous avons déjà dépassé l’année record de 2022 (72 000 hectares brûlés). La lutte contre les incendies commence par la prévention. 9 feux sur 10 sont d’origine humaine et la plupart naissent d’une imprudence : un mégot, un barbecue, des travaux réalisés sans précaution. Reporter un chantier, débroussailler son terrain, ne pas fumer près de la végétation : ces gestes simples sauvent des forêts, des maisons et des vies. Mais tous ces feux ne sont pas des accidents. Certains sont allumés délibérément : c’est un crime, puni de 15 ans de réclusion criminelle. Depuis le 6 juillet, 162 interpellations ont déjà eu lieu. Les forces de sécurité sont pleinement mobilisées pour identifier les incendiaires. Ils seront retrouvés, interpellés et répondront de leurs actes devant la justice.

    83229041472235K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202676x their median

    Looks like a sci-fi movie scene https://t.co/ViNX6J7nF3

    3213319754K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202624x their median

    If the SpaceX Edition Roadster isn't road legal, should Tesla call it the Trackster?

    8542913.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202616x their median

    Erik Brown who helped save kids from a flooded cave in Thailand 2018 sadly passed away at 44. I'm sure people will continue to be thankful for his brave efforts long after his passing. https://t.co/as7WvZr79w

    709001.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.6x their median

    Even us poor guys dream of owning a @cybertruck ! 😆 https://t.co/Sf96EFU6AB

    333934.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.4x their median

    R.I.P. https://t.co/UTcPlwo1dX

    25200526 viewsView on X
  • Mar 19, 20265.2x their median

    The latest episode of the show Abundance Tonight seems to indicate that Elon might be right on the whole simulation theory thing. https://t.co/d0LNLPdCSX

    211403.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.8x their median

    I haven't tried Kalshi, but to receive a lifetime ban from them is probably an achievement. https://t.co/TVy5y7y4I6

    11210616 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 436 times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.568% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 12948x its own typical post.

What is Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ's engagement rate on X?
Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ (@SuckerCarlson) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 76,715 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Sucker Carlson ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SuckerCarlson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SuckerCarlson post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going