Back to @SpaceTelescope's profile

Space Telescope Science Institute engagement report

@SpaceTelescope - 345K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 345K followers
Per impression
1.09%
8.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.08%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 487 interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nasawebb, #nasaroman.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #nasawebb, #nasaroman.

Compared with accounts its own size

Space Telescope Science Institute's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Space Telescope Science Institute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,482 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link79% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 79% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20265.1x their median

    Hubble has observed many Messier catalog items over 35+ years, including the Orion Nebula, the Omega Nebula, globular star cluster Messier 75, and galaxy Messier 109. Scroll through Hubble’s Messier images, and find your favorite: https://t.co/G8MuLavcm7 🔭 https://t.co/XO4MGqSjWI

    417617213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.7x their median

    #NASAWebb is already helping scientists advance our knowledge about the life cycle of stars. How do stars form? Why do stars form in groups? What role do black holes play in the evolution of stars in galaxies? ➡️ https://t.co/ccF5FxLwxq 🔭 https://t.co/c5l5P9ttFq

    383629012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.6x their median

    #NASARoman has been enclosed inside the SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket’s fairing in the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida: https://t.co/Om8fWpqJxT https://t.co/i7dDKlRh2w

    369653513K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.5x their median

    #NASARoman activated the Wide Field Instrument—a 300-megapixel infrared camera that will allow it to explore wide swaths of the cosmos. This test image captures the very first photons of starlight to reach the instrument—taken as performance assessment: https://t.co/PcJoaUJa2b https://t.co/PMtTfbVTv3

    364615516K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.6x their median

    #NASARoman is making its 3-month journey to L2. Along the way, Roman is undergoing a process called commissioning, where systems are turned on, adjusted, calibrated, and prepared for science operations. Follow along! We're currently on Day 3. ⬇️ https://t.co/z1i3iLf1rN

    288564012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.6x their median

    #NASARoman is currently on its way to L2 where gravitational forces balance to keep objects in steady orbits. The animation begins shortly after launch and concludes with Roman entering its halo orbit around L2. Keep up with commissioning: https://t.co/LPCpwCtSTT https://t.co/HWHQYYMXyC

    301413214K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.3x their median

    #NASAWebb peered into the Flame Nebula, locating the faint infrared signatures of several brown dwarfs, objects so small that their cores will never sustain nuclear fusion of hydrogen. The smallest among them is two to three times the mass of Jupiter: https://t.co/tRexqijn44 🔭 https://t.co/Krm0Z5Pvma

    267388511K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.1x their median

    NEW: One of the largest #NASAWebb images released to date reveals a sweeping view of nearby star forming region IC 348, spanning a whopping 31,000 by 38,000 pixels! Look closely, there’s something to discover in every corner of this stellar nursery: https://t.co/LdCQfu8pyp https://t.co/nr0zitqjl2

    249425112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.0x their median

    Scientists call this region the Extreme Outer Galaxy due to its location at the edge of our Milky Way. It contains two massive molecular clouds from which clusters of stars are actively forming, as captured in this #NASAWebb image: https://t.co/BiJBsbaKMZ https://t.co/VIVwST7PER

    243357111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.7x their median

    This starry view of the nearby star-forming region IC 348 sits just 1,000 light-years away in the constellation Perseus. Cold clouds of molecular hydrogen gas collapse to form new stars, creating glowing, sculpted scenes like this one. (1/5) 🧵 https://t.co/P9Qo5psWFc

    22625418.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nasawebb#nasaroman

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 487 interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nasawebb, #nasaroman.

What is Space Telescope Science Institute's engagement rate on X?
Space Telescope Science Institute (@SpaceTelescope) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 344,613 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Space Telescope Science Institute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SpaceTelescope have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SpaceTelescope post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going