Space Telescope Science Institute engagement report
@SpaceTelescope - 345K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 487 interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nasawebb, #nasaroman.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #nasawebb, #nasaroman.
Compared with accounts its own size
Space Telescope Science Institute's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.028%, Space Telescope Science Institute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 79% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 79% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 20265.1x their median
Hubble has observed many Messier catalog items over 35+ years, including the Orion Nebula, the Omega Nebula, globular star cluster Messier 75, and galaxy Messier 109. Scroll through Hubble’s Messier images, and find your favorite: https://t.co/G8MuLavcm7 🔭 https://t.co/XO4MGqSjWI
- Sep 10, 20264.7x their median
#NASAWebb is already helping scientists advance our knowledge about the life cycle of stars. How do stars form? Why do stars form in groups? What role do black holes play in the evolution of stars in galaxies? ➡️ https://t.co/ccF5FxLwxq 🔭 https://t.co/c5l5P9ttFq
- Aug 24, 20264.6x their median
#NASARoman has been enclosed inside the SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket’s fairing in the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida: https://t.co/Om8fWpqJxT https://t.co/i7dDKlRh2w
- Sep 15, 20264.5x their median
#NASARoman activated the Wide Field Instrument—a 300-megapixel infrared camera that will allow it to explore wide swaths of the cosmos. This test image captures the very first photons of starlight to reach the instrument—taken as performance assessment: https://t.co/PcJoaUJa2b https://t.co/PMtTfbVTv3
- Sep 2, 20263.6x their median
#NASARoman is making its 3-month journey to L2. Along the way, Roman is undergoing a process called commissioning, where systems are turned on, adjusted, calibrated, and prepared for science operations. Follow along! We're currently on Day 3. ⬇️ https://t.co/z1i3iLf1rN
- Sep 9, 20263.6x their median
#NASARoman is currently on its way to L2 where gravitational forces balance to keep objects in steady orbits. The animation begins shortly after launch and concludes with Roman entering its halo orbit around L2. Keep up with commissioning: https://t.co/LPCpwCtSTT https://t.co/HWHQYYMXyC
- Oct 9, 20263.3x their median
#NASAWebb peered into the Flame Nebula, locating the faint infrared signatures of several brown dwarfs, objects so small that their cores will never sustain nuclear fusion of hydrogen. The smallest among them is two to three times the mass of Jupiter: https://t.co/tRexqijn44 🔭 https://t.co/Krm0Z5Pvma
- Sep 15, 20263.1x their median
NEW: One of the largest #NASAWebb images released to date reveals a sweeping view of nearby star forming region IC 348, spanning a whopping 31,000 by 38,000 pixels! Look closely, there’s something to discover in every corner of this stellar nursery: https://t.co/LdCQfu8pyp https://t.co/nr0zitqjl2
- Sep 18, 20263.0x their median
Scientists call this region the Extreme Outer Galaxy due to its location at the edge of our Milky Way. It contains two massive molecular clouds from which clusters of stars are actively forming, as captured in this #NASAWebb image: https://t.co/BiJBsbaKMZ https://t.co/VIVwST7PER
- Sep 15, 20262.7x their median
This starry view of the nearby star-forming region IC 348 sits just 1,000 light-years away in the constellation Perseus. Cold clouds of molecular hydrogen gas collapse to form new stars, creating glowing, sculpted scenes like this one. (1/5) 🧵 https://t.co/P9Qo5psWFc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 487 interactions, about 5.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nasawebb, #nasaroman.
- What is Space Telescope Science Institute's engagement rate on X?
- Space Telescope Science Institute (@SpaceTelescope) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 344,613 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.028%, Space Telescope Science Institute sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,482 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SpaceTelescope have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SpaceTelescope post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.