Back to @Sophie_Choudry's profile

Sophie C engagement report

@Sophie_Choudry - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
0.955%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
0.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
110
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.955% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.551% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 478K interactions, about 7142x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #captainsmitmachchhar, #dussehra, #mijwan.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #captainsmitmachchhar, #dussehra, #mijwan.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sophie C's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Sophie C sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 511 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 20267142x their median

    And so the World Cup final will be between two teams who couldn’t beat Cape Verde in 90 minutes.

    435K42K7629885.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262241x their median

    BREAKING: FIFA are set to investigate the behaviour of Argentina after the final whistle at the World Cup final. 🚨 https://t.co/Z1soC4thpt

    128K15K3.1K1.5K4.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20261276x their median

    Vozinha and Cabo Verde making history 🇨🇻 #FIFAWorldCup https://t.co/TIEc3lh2GO

    124K16K5834221.3M viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20261118x their median

    ‘MICHAEL’ has opened with $217.4M worldwide. The biggest opening of all time for a biopic. https://t.co/Tb8NNPlbld

    106K14K1.4K2.0K16M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20261447x their median

    What the f*ck is this referee doing? Argentina should have 5 bookings by now. Dirty team going woefully unpunished.

    84K6.9K5.3K6194.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026785x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Zinedine Zidane is the new France MANAGER. https://t.co/2htVPOslF2

    80K4.6K3821.1K4.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20261215x their median

    Argentina players starting fights as soon as the whistle blows, attacking Spanish players. Nobody deserves to lose this World Cup more than Argentina. The dirtiest, nastiest team in the tournament. Pathetic. Class from Spain, the whole world has been behind you 🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸

    69K10K63686552K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20261003x their median

    How do Argentina keep getting away with so many aggressive fouls man? It’s honestly so frustrating to watch.

    61K4.7K347951.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026177x their median

    I genuinely don't understand it. If a goal is ruled out because of an accidental standing on a player's foot, how is Salah not given a penalty? You can't have it both ways. Either both are fouls, or neither are. That's all fans ask for consistency.

    57K7.6K771180954K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2026468x their median

    I’m so mad about this and all the other shit Argentina got away with https://t.co/b3q0suDSHy

    42K5.3K3.4K5941.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#captainsmitmachchhar#dussehra#mijwan#nanapatekar#saynotoanimalexperimentationbill

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.955% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.551% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 478K interactions, about 7142x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #captainsmitmachchhar, #dussehra, #mijwan.

What is Sophie C's engagement rate on X?
Sophie C (@Sophie_Choudry) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,091,356 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Sophie C sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sophie_Choudry have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sophie_Choudry post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going