Back to @SolBrah's profile

⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬 engagement report

@SolBrah - 252K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.128%
of 252K followers
Per impression
3.35%
9.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
320
interactions (median)
Saved
0.325%
31 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 320 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 3.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 222K interactions, about 692x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #nofap.

Compared with accounts its own size

⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.128%, ⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026692x their median

    i should wake up and automatically be restored to full health, that’s how sleeping should work, what is this horseshit

    200K21K1262491.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202676x their median

    Yes. I have cancer. Yes. They have given me 3 to 5 years remaining if the treatments do not work. Yes. My wife left for another man half way through this journey. Yes. I am Still fighting and Still standing strong. Yes. I am struggling but will survive one way or another. No. I will not do another GoFundMe account because it was completely embarrassing that a fucking murderer begging for legal funds from parents and others have raised millions and I could not raise a dollar. "Fuck You Very Much". Yes. I am pissed off.

    23K664648512.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202621x their median

    I found mold in my gym > 4,900 spores/m3 > penicillium/aspergillus 4,800 spores/m3 > ulocladium (~40 spores/m3) > stage 4, high > outdoor control 360 spores/m3 https://t.co/BtTrJnfUtQ

    6.2K92502761.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202614x their median

    Stopped taking magnesium before bed like 6 months ago and ever since I wake up almost every day ready to go, great energy

    4.4K22101141.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20268.2x their median

    so Fucking depressed it’s crazy https://t.co/vbni8VMDBl

    2.6K5515755K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20267.4x their median

    Rubbing liquid magnesium on your balls sounds wild until you realise the scrotal skin is paper thin. Absorbs STRAIGHT to the Leydig cells: where testosterone gets manufactured. EVERY steroidogenic enzyme which converts cholesterol into testosterone in that chain needs magnesium to fire. Pure vitality delivered straight to the source.

    2.2K1037015190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.3x their median

    AFFIRM: I AM THE MASTER OF MY OWN ENERGY. THE MORE I GIVE, THE MORE I RECEIVE. I AM A POWERHOUSE, I AM INDESTRUCTIBLE. https://t.co/uC6rqYjhi7

    1.3K619017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.3x their median

    Very important to simplify your life. Whatever you can remove from your possessions, from your schedule, from your mental bandwidth, do so. The things that you own take up space in your head. When you own less, things become clearer. Decisions are easier, and you reduce attachment to physical reality, which benefits you spiritually and mentally. Practise regular clearouts and donations of what you do own, and also try to live in a way that is simple and enjoy that, for the best things in life are not attached to owning possessions.

    9846415519K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.3x their median

    Scared of something? Pretend that things is scared of YOU! Attack it!

    9895211617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.7x their median

    It’s incredible when you hit the god mode of socializing on a long streak of semen retention zero social anxiety, throwing out compliments, people responding well, never run out of things to say, zero filter or doubt Of course you can do this without retaining… but it makes it feel effortless

    8351719336K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nofap

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 320 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 3.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 222K interactions, about 692x its own typical post.

What is ⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬's engagement rate on X?
⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬 (@SolBrah) has an engagement rate of 0.128%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 252,155 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.128%, ⚑️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SolBrah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SolBrah post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going