Back to @SlayeddotCoom's profile

SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN) engagement report

@SlayeddotCoom - 486K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.25%
of 486K followers
Per impression
1.54%
79K views on a typical post
Reach
16.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.197%
156 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.25%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 79K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN)'s engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.25%, SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202256x their median

    [Patreon/Substar Animation Release] Widowmaker's Post-Workout Protein Infusion Idk much about OW lore, but I think WM's skin is purple because she was modified to not need to breathe for long periods of time. Sooo this could be canon.. 🎙️- @JackieSpyceVA 🔊 - @HentAudio https://t.co/zMFNbowMQX

    59K9.4K26072View on X
  • Oct 3, 202634x their median

    It's out. Stop asking me when it's coming out. Hit the bio if you wanna see the full 12 minute video. https://t.co/vnJ19om5QM

    39K2.3K12215815K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202627x their median

    Well I went cyberpsycho. Now to lock in and finish the rest of the animation finally. Just need to do a little more eye and mouth animation and then its just the fluid simulation, lighting and final render. Then finish audio and it's ready to release. https://t.co/UE4arz8uzT

    30K2.0K606553K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202615x their median

    Did a first pass on facial animation today. Gotta tighten it up in a couple places still. https://t.co/9JjjPjxB41

    18K966231266K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202614x their median

    okay so I finished up the animation for sue's facial expression here and did a shaded test render to showcase it. Please ignore the issues with the lighting bugging and acting all weird. Lighting is the last thing I'll fix after fluid simulation. https://t.co/v3JG8Z7KJE

    16K867301290K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202613x their median

    Oh, that’s where she’s gonna hide allat. https://t.co/CYok2n7FVq

    15K776400231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202612x their median

    Another Ela Comm Image https://t.co/JEo4IZzm9T

    14K665270177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    ace attorney witnesses when they have to testify about a murder https://t.co/rdQJxyg6mx

    13K1.3K3620407K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20267.8x their median

    Image Coomission: "Detroit: Be Cum Glorious" In an attempt to drum up some more funds to relieve his crippling credit card debt, Todd modifies his AX400 (Kara) with a pair of outrageously oversized boob implants before renting her out to the most popular sex club in Detroit. Phallic philandering and general fornication aren't datasets downloaded to Kara's firmware. But she'll have to adapt quickly, there are more than 80 pent up patrons waiting for their chance to rearrange her insides and the first one looks like a challenge in and of itself...

    9.0K510141123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.0x their median

    What 200mg of zinc does to a man. (Don’t actually do this.) https://t.co/izRvupoAuq

    7.0K199391257K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 0.25%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 79K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 69K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN)'s engagement rate on X?
SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN) (@SlayeddotCoom) has an engagement rate of 0.25%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 486,100 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.25%, SLAYED.COOM (IMAGE COOMISSIONS OPEN) sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SlayeddotCoom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SlayeddotCoom post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going