Back to @Slate's profile

Slate engagement report

@Slate - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 852 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.039%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
28.67/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 852 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.183% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 852 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 233 interactions, about 233x its own typical post.

Measured over 852 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #dearprudie.

Compared with accounts its own size

Slate's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Slate sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 121 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 7, 2026233x their median

    Slow Burn: Becoming Justice Gorsuch is coming on May 13th. Watch the trailer now. Follow Slow Burn for more: https://t.co/i9Ukcr6sab https://t.co/3jew1iEt0s

    2419512225K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026225x their median

    Kimberly Guilfoyle texted about a lot more than money. https://t.co/BCoCY0msQc

    1593621952K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026162x their median

    I teach at Yale. There are Gen Z Catholics all around me. I know what must be done. https://t.co/zepM8GReYO

    80114130141K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 2026150x their median

    The Kelly Clarkson store saga has only one embarrassing party, and it is her. https://t.co/UHSuPvFA9P

    11492527.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202685x their median

    Vivek Ramaswamy is set for a historic flameout in Ohio. I went to see how it all went wrong. https://t.co/IhZ7G5tfns

    7273322K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202675x their median

    The Kelly Clarkson store saga has only one embarrassing party, and it is her. https://t.co/IfhtbuQOzQ

    5341536.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202646x their median

    Kimberly Guilfoyle texted about a lot more than money. https://t.co/0yqjXmsAwL

    3680211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202637x their median

    One Emmys moment will certainly make history. It was not the one NBC wanted. https://t.co/csnbXYsPIU

    3241017K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202632x their median

    Kimberly Guilfoyle texted about a lot more than money. https://t.co/FI66UYm5Ui

    238019.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202629x their median

    She is the first person ever to survive after being given lethal injection drugs. This system is madness. https://t.co/kQkkAOawGw

    209006.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dearprudie

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 852 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.183% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 28.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 852 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 233 interactions, about 233x its own typical post.

What is Slate's engagement rate on X?
Slate (@Slate) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 852 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,382,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Slate sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Slate have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Slate post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 28.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going