Sight and Sound magazine engagement report
@SightSoundmag - 161K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 203x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #lff.
Compared with accounts its own size
Sight and Sound magazine's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.006%, Sight and Sound magazine sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 19% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 75% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 244 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 2, 2026203x their median
In 2022, we invited over 1,500 film critics, programmers, curators, archivists, film historians and academics to vote in our once-a-decade Greatest Films of All Time poll. It was the eighth edition of a poll which has run since 1952 https://t.co/jaImjKXt6r
- Aug 24, 2026124x their median
The female gaze: 100 overlooked films directed by women In 2015, we asked 100 critics and filmmakers, including Jane Campion, Greta Gerwig, Claire Denis, Isabelle Huppert, Agnès Varda, Tilda Swinton, to nominate a film by a female director they believe has been forgotten or unfairly overlooked How many have you seen?
- Sep 24, 202696x their median
NEW ISSUE! KEN RUSSELL’S THE DEVILS Sex, power, hysteria and sacrilege - the masterpiece returns as you’ve never seen it before Featuring new writing from Mark Kermode, Linda Ruth Williams and @RealGDT + an unearthed 1995 interview with writer-director Russell, a new interview with continuity supervisor Ann Skinner, and behind-the-scenes images from the BFI National Archive
- Aug 11, 202681x their median
The Greatest Films of All Time, as voted for by Barry Jenkins Would any be in your top 10? https://t.co/48sBH3s6pO
- Oct 15, 202666x their median
Sacrilege and censorship: a Ken Russell’s The Devils watchlist – get Devils ready with a list of further viewing, selected by the S&S team How many have you seen? https://t.co/JmW24Zuz1F
- Sep 16, 202649x their median
Patricio Guzmán, 1941-2026 The Chilean maker of radically political documentaries, including the landmark Battle of Chile trilogy (1975-79) has died aged 85 In tribute, we republish a 2012 interview on Nostalgia for the Light, a film which connects Chile’s political memory with its landscape (link below)
- Aug 27, 202639x their median
NEW ISSUE! 🧡 Jane Schoenbrun talks identity, reality and building Camp Miasma 🏕️ + Schoenbrun’s filmography, from the beginning to the future, in their own words + the aesthetics and influences of Camp Miasma https://t.co/VfG0HEBUPT
- Sep 28, 202623x their median
NEW ISSUE NOW ON SALE! KEN RUSSELL’S THE DEVILS Sex, power, hysteria and sacrilege – the masterpiece returns as you’ve never seen it before Featuring new writing from Mark Kermode, Linda Ruth Williams and @RealGDT https://t.co/Lapr7wrP4u https://t.co/B8sPXavNI6
- Oct 7, 202621x their median
Eva Marie Saint, 1924-2026 Among the last icons of the golden age of Hollywood, Saint was never quite a movie star in the conventional sense. The Oscar-winning actress, who has died aged 102, leaves behind a career defined less by celebrity than by generosity, craft and an abiding faith in the ensemble Our obituary below
- Sep 16, 202620x their median
“I never made a movie to just go make a movie, it was always an exploration of filmmaking” Last year, we sat down with Tom Cruise to look back over his career, from a childhood play pretend as Charlie Chaplin and John Wayne, to the culmination of the decades-spanning Mission Impossible series – and the Iñárritu collaboration beyond Link below
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video, 31% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 203x its own typical post.
- What is Sight and Sound magazine's engagement rate on X?
- Sight and Sound magazine (@SightSoundmag) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,957 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.006%, Sight and Sound magazine sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SightSoundmag have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SightSoundmag post?
- Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.