Back to @ShamrockKen's profile

KEN SHAMROCK engagement report

@ShamrockKen - 158K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 158K followers
Per impression
0%
611 views on a typical post
Reach
0.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 611 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.387% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 223x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

KEN SHAMROCK's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, KEN SHAMROCK sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link95% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 41 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 4, 2026223x their median

    Se mira e instantáneamente se pone a llorar porque sabe que se va a morir… Nunca te olvidaremos, Iryna!🕊️ https://t.co/Pp6pN8n33A

    64K8.4K9311815.5M viewsView on X
  • May 22, 202632x their median

    So let's talk through this. So people come to this country because most of them are not safe in the country they left. Then that same person's then burn the American Flag,while holding the flag they ran from, is it me or does this not make sense.

    9.7K62141436132K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 202610x their median

    So I watched the Towers on 911 get blasted with planes but one tower after about a hour collapse like a demolition explosion & the tower came straight down so I have to believe that the base of the structure all collapsed at the same time. WOW WHATS THE ODDS OF THAT HAPPENING.

    2.7K220350141468K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20269.4x their median

    Suicidal Empathy is whats invading our country. WAKE up. We need to start fighting for our values that built this great nation

    2.8K194111550K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20266.6x their median

    So Jackson Dart was asked to introduce the POTUS but then was ridiculed by sports media for just simply introducing him. WORLD IS CRAZY.

    2.0K74105436K viewsView on X
  • May 29, 20266.0x their median

    So illegals are being prioritized over the ones that did it the right way. Why would anyone follow our immigration laws if they are getting free medical & money to stay & all they got to do is vote Democrat.

    1.8K9798846K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20265.3x their median

    So I posted about illegals getting the upper hand on the people who did it the right way & how our immigration laws need to be upheld. But in return just plain disrespectful comments.

    1.5K38219647K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20265.0x their median

    GOD BLESS ALL WHO LOVE GOD PRAY FOR ALL .

    1.5K9636226K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 20263.0x their median

    Being a believer in christ does not put anyone in a position to think they are better then the next person. What it does do is put us in a position to live our lives according to our lord & savior. PERIOD

    8676664316K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20262.6x their median

    I wish everyone a safe & FUN 4th of july. Two hundred & fifty years

    7842937112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 611 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.387% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 223x its own typical post.

What is KEN SHAMROCK's engagement rate on X?
KEN SHAMROCK (@ShamrockKen) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,900 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, KEN SHAMROCK sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ShamrockKen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ShamrockKen post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going