Back to @Rothmus's profile

Rothmus 🏴 engagement report

@Rothmus - 673K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 673K followers
Per impression
1.68%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
232
interactions (median)
Saved
0.08%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 232 interactions against 673K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inequality, #poverty.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #inequality, #poverty.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rothmus 🏴's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Rothmus 🏴 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 680 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202640x their median

    The bad news is Cash for Clunkers wasted $3 billion destroying 690,000 working cars. It also raised used car prices on people who can’t buy new ones. Economist Ted Gayer also showed the cost of each extra sale the program caused was about $24,000 because most were going to buy new cars in the following months anyway. And the carbon cuts cost 7x what the government’s economists said the carbon was worth. But the good news is… jk it’s all bad lmao.

    7.5K1.6K15251121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202628x their median

    The Bolsheviks ended the anti-communist peasant uprising in Tambov with poison gas. In 1920, farmers revolted against the Bolsheviks who seized their grain and starved them. The regime authorized poison gas against the forests and villages sheltering the rebels. Very few states have used poison gas against their own people in the 20th century, especially not against the very class their revolution claimed to represent. They also built concentration camps for the wives and children, threatening to execute them unless their husbands and fathers surrendered. The uprising ended with tens of thousands of peasants starved, gassed, and shot.

    4.7K1.5K887196K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202625x their median

    This was the day every sane person realized these folks didn’t “just want to be left alone.” Colorado spent over a decade trying to force Jack Phillips to bake cakes his faith forbids, and a 7-2 Supreme Court win only bought him a short pause. He declined one custom wedding cake in 2012 and offered the couple every other item in the shop. The Civil Rights Commission ordered him to design cakes for same sex weddings anyway, retrain his staff, and file regular compliance reports. One commissioner compared his Christianity to the justifications used for slavery and the Holocaust. Kennedy wrote that this was hostility toward religion and the Court ruled for Phillips. Days later, Colorado opened a new case over a cake celebrating a gender transition and kept him in court for years. The state treated his conscience as a problem that needed monitoring and correction. Winning at the highest court did not change that.

    4.8K816842790K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202624x their median

    A world with zero discrimination would still produce wildly unequal group outcomes. Thomas Sowell demonstrated how firstborn sons score higher on IQ tests and land more prestigious careers than their younger brothers, but nobody blames discrimination for that gap. Canadian junior hockey shows that players born January through March dominate the leagues because the January 1 cutoff makes them the oldest and strongest kids in every age group. Overseas Chinese communities run retail across Southeast Asia, Lebanese merchants dominate trade in West Africa, and German immigrants once owned the American brewing industry. Same specialization repeats under completely different majorities and legal systems. Treating every disparity as automatic proof of discrimination starts with the wrong diagnosis, and the wrong diagnosis never delivers the right cure. But the fantasy that some planner can just rearrange people like chess pieces and force equal results remains one of the most stubborn fallacies in economics.

    4.3K92714533471K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202614x their median

    You can own the land and still spend 16 years in court just to build a house on it. The Sacketts bought a dry half acre lot near Priest Lake, Idaho and started construction in 2007. The EPA called it a wetland even though no water touched the property and threatened $75,000 a day in fines under a “significant nexus” theory tying it to a distant tributary. Pacific Legal Foundation took it all the way. Unanimous 2012 ruling: they could challenge the order before the fines started. Another decade of fighting. Unanimous 2023 ruling: Alito killed the nexus test and required an actual surface connection to permanent water, pulling millions of acres out of EPA control. 16 years and two 9-0 decisions just to use land they already owned.

    2.7K46834942K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20269.3x their median

    >be Margaret Sanger >found what became Planned Parenthood >don’t want word getting out you want to exterminate the Negro population >call the poor “human weeds” >charity was a mistake because it let the unfit reproduce >push compulsory sterilization >speak to a women’s Klan chapter in New Jersey + dozen follow up invitations >launch the Negro Project so black ministers would front birth control in the South >keep the population control agenda hidden >movement sterilizes more than 60,000 people under state law >the Supreme Court blessed it in Buck v. Bell >Holmes writes that three generations of imbeciles were enough >Nazi Germany cited the American statutes as a model >Planned Parenthood still takes over $600 million a year from the federal government Progressive icon.

    1.8K320292050K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20268.5x their median

    BREAKING: The jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial could not come to a unanimous verdict The judge just sent them back to continue deliberating. https://t.co/HxzkPtSWyd

    1.4K14939464362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20266.0x their median

    The Federal Reserve was designed by the bankers it was supposed to police. In November 1910, a handful of top bankers and one senator slipped onto Jekyll Island under first names only, drafted the entire framework in secret, and 3 years later Congress approved it. Paul Warburg of Kuhn Loeb helped write the rules and then became one of the Fed’s first governors. The promise was an end to banking panics. 15 years later the Great Depression hit. And since 1913, the dollar has lost 96% of its purchasing power. An institution created by bankers, run by bankers, and charged with managing the money bankers lend was never going to restrain itself.

    1.1K289271826K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.5x their median

    Tens of thousands of scientists signed the Great Barrington Declaration before the NIH director demanded a takedown and Twitter blacklisted it so it could never trend. October 2020, the declaration called to end lockdowns, shield the elderly, and let the rest of society live. 4 days later, Francis Collins emailed Fauci calling the authors fringe epidemiologists and demanding a quick devastating published takedown. The Lancet followed with the John Snow Memorandum branding the whole approach dangerous and scientifically unsound. Twitter’s internal team put the declaration on a blacklist. Instead of gaslighting now about censorship and that there never were any lockdowns, they should all be in jail.

    9802928753K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.1x their median

    We raised $22.5M to fix both halves of the custom medical device supply chain: the paperwork that blocks them and the manufacturing that slows them. In America 🇺🇸, it's easier to prescribe a patient opioids than to get them custom insoles to prevent amputation. Three generations of my family watched that up close and couldn't fix it. Here's what we've built @HikeMedAI :

    817584143790K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#inequality#poverty

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 232 interactions against 673K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 40x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #inequality, #poverty.

What is Rothmus 🏴's engagement rate on X?
Rothmus 🏴 (@Rothmus) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 673,086 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Rothmus 🏴 sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Rothmus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Rothmus post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going