Back to @RodrigoScarpa's profile

Rodrigo Scarpa engagement report

@RodrigoScarpa - 4.0M followers on X

Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 4.0M followers
Per impression
0.651%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
62
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.37/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.651% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.236% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 948x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #algoritmomeodeia, #debatenaglobo, #humor.

Measured over 172 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #algoritmomeodeia, #debatenaglobo, #humor.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rodrigo Scarpa's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Rodrigo Scarpa sits below the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.693%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 211,892 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,457 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.693%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video34% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 24, 2026948x their median

    Gente, é impressão minha ou o velhinho está ENGOLINDO o trambiqueiro?

    42K6.2K9.7K3491.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 2026705x their median

    O lado bom do Lula ser eleito é que ficaremos mais 4 anos sem que o Porchat e o Adnet apareçam dizendo que estão fiscalizando o governo.

    41K2.4K47966928K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026370x their median

    O Brasil mostrando a direção… Varios malandros ficando desempregado… Grande Dia👍🏻

    21K1.4K1929135K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2026308x their median

    Gente, urgente, cinquenta e quatro mentiras. Não é razoável por parte do nosso adversário. Amanhã o voto é pela verdade, é @LulaOficial 13! https://t.co/8Hr0XApbXW

    13K5.0K1.4K16867K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 2026194x their median

    🚨URGENTE - Justiça manda prender Marco Antonio Villa por dever R$ 570 mil de pensão Até o momento, ele é considerado foragido da polícia. https://t.co/a7Cxe7a3BG

    9.9K1.2K728224444K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 2026165x their median

    🚨AGORA: Octavio Guedes falando que o método Janones vai ser estudado nas próximas eleições. #DebateNaGlobo https://t.co/z86GIsKXp8

    8.6K1.2K39548263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026144x their median

    Os ministros estão aconselhando a NÃO transmitir o plenário de terça, com medo de barraco ao vivo. A única audiência garantida da TV brasileira, e querem tirar do ar.

    8.5K361291461K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026139x their median

    Pelo menos já temos as desculpas prontas. Se Bolsonaro perder foi gópi pq estenderam o tempo da eleição. Se o Lula perder é pq impediram o transporte dos eleitores dele. Oa 2 lados ja tem as narrativas pra continuar brigando kkkkkkk

    7.8K6548541198K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2026120x their median

    Minha opinião sobre o debate de ontem. https://t.co/fyAgnREBch

    6.7K42628415312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026107x their median

    A Renata Vasconcellos sabatinou o Zema no Jornal Nacional ontem, interrompeu o candidato pra contestar os dados da dívida de Minas, e terminou a noite mais comentada no X do que o próprio candidato. Vinte e dois anos de TV me ensinaram uma coisa: quando o entrevistador vira o assunto, ou ele foi muito bem, ou o entrevistado foi muito mal. Ontem foi os dois.

    6.4K12313515361K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#algoritmomeodeia#debatenaglobo#humor#lula13

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 172 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.651% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.236% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 172 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 948x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #algoritmomeodeia, #debatenaglobo, #humor.

What is Rodrigo Scarpa's engagement rate on X?
Rodrigo Scarpa (@RodrigoScarpa) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 172 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,009,699 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Rodrigo Scarpa sits below the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RodrigoScarpa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RodrigoScarpa post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going