Back to @RoarWeb3's profile

Roar engagement report

@RoarWeb3 - 158K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.168%
of 158K followers
Per impression
4.27%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
265
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.168%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 4.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Roar's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.168%, Roar sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 46 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 14, 202617x their median

    you will become rich in 2026 just lock tf in.

    3.2K58078231318K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20265.8x their median

    drop your sol wallet thank me later.

    565190780226K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20265.5x their median

    $KIMCHI AIRDROP! πŸͺ‚ Drop your $SOL address and follow me! https://t.co/hVIaiXfh52

    587215649026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.0x their median

    drop your wallets, you have 60 mins πŸ’™

    542148624324K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.8x their median

    drop your wallets, you have 60 mins πŸ’™

    509158601020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.6x their median

    drop your wallets, you have 60 mins πŸ’™

    475149600125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.6x their median

    Bullish ❌ Flokish βœ… https://t.co/wRSjWQxtQ3

    969174581046K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.4x their median

    As i promised: $4 to $80,000 Challenge starts tomorrow Missing $4? I’ll cover it Adding 800 participants Accepted so far: 38/800 Wanna join? Here’s how: β€’ Like & Retweet β€’ Comment "πŸ†" β€’ Must be following https://t.co/pd94K8aGpE

    472319361317K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20264.1x their median

    drop your sol address 10 random wallets you have 24 hours

    427164492116K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.9x their median

    drop your sol wallets, you have 60 minutes

    415127499120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.168%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 4.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Roar's engagement rate on X?
Roar (@RoarWeb3) has an engagement rate of 0.168%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 157,732 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.168%, Roar sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RoarWeb3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RoarWeb3 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going