Revista Crusoé engagement report
@RevistaCrusoe - 280K followers on X
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.466% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Revista Crusoé's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.01%, Revista Crusoé sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 4% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 14, 202655x their median
Eleitores de Renan são os que mais migram para Flávio, aponta Quaest https://t.co/9qPCqG3EpN.
- Sep 18, 202643x their median
As fake news de Moraes https://t.co/Gcp6B1KAKI. Ministro que perseguiu "redes de desinformação" por anos agora se beneficia de mentiras e meias verdades ao tentar evitar investigação.
- Sep 18, 202634x their median
Os quatro juízes do apocalipse https://t.co/WynpDbGbMW. Para salvar Alexandre de Moraes, seus aliados estão dispostos a acabar com a República. https://t.co/B6cNtG0rRy
- Oct 16, 202629x their median
Vorcaro orientou vídeos de Gabriela Prioli: https://t.co/8L2xgu7RbC Banco Master teria assinado contrato de doze meses com influenciadora, segundo mensagens divulgadas pelo Estadão
- Sep 15, 202625x their median
O covarde e excêntrico pedido de impedimento de Nunes Marques: https://t.co/8AIZKeE7ts Ministro do STF alegou que, por ser presidente do TSE, não pode participar de julgamento com impactos nas eleições Por @DudaTeixeira https://t.co/FWucPhzKz4
- Sep 2, 202619x their median
1/ Nova pesquisa Quaest revela liderança de Lula (37%), estabilidade de Flávio Bolsonaro (30%) e ascensão de Cury (10%). Renan aparece com 3%. Caiado, Marçal e Zema ficam com 1% cada. Nesse cenário, a eleição tem pouca chance de ser concluída no primeiro turno. https://t.co/IuidVA8DLG
- Sep 4, 202619x their median
Censura em campanha https://t.co/jScWGRsKGU. Decisão heterodoxa de Dias Toffoli prejudica o candidato Renan Santos no momento em que ele crescia nas pesquisas.
- Sep 1, 202617x their median
Agora vai rolar impeachment de Paulo Gonet? https://t.co/kvOi2d7WZZ Um requerimento foi protocolado em março de 2025 no Senado, mas não foi adiante Por @DudaTeixeira
- Aug 31, 202616x their median
Economist questiona se Brasil terá seu "momento Milei" com Renan Santos https://t.co/tJ96IpMJ55.
- Sep 16, 202614x their median
A 'ética da máfia' de Gilmar chega pelo zap: https://t.co/CPPh4EmXij Nas conversas com Luiz Fux e Nunes Marques, decano da Corte tenta intimidar colegas e exige ações drásticas Por @DudaTeixeira
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.466% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 55x its own typical post.
- What is Revista Crusoé's engagement rate on X?
- Revista Crusoé (@RevistaCrusoe) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 280,271 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.01%, Revista Crusoé sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RevistaCrusoe have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RevistaCrusoe post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.