Back to @RadioShackUSA's profile

RadioShack engagement report

@RadioShackUSA - 316K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 316K followers
Per impression
0.627%
9.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
62
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 0.627% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

RadioShack's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, RadioShack sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202624x their median

    everyone asking 'are you back' like we didn’t spend the last couple of months in the backroom searching for the exact adapter needed to plug ourselves back into the matrix https://t.co/Y5YAHEzVba

    1.3K941091728K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20268.1x their median

    did you miss me? https://t.co/tIRphBDYdj

    4144835516K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.9x their median

    me: 'hey internet, answer in one word: do you still love us?' the internet today: 'ABSOLUTELY' 😭

    2661023311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.5x their median

    currently vibrating at a frequency that allows me to see through time. anyway, good morning.

    1921510211K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.1x their median

    my boss has zero faith in my cm skills, but he's letting me give you a special coupon if we hit 3.5k likes on this tweet. save this poor soul and help me help you. https://t.co/OB4Kl1knHW

    16417746.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.3x their median

    blasting "september" by earth, wind & fire on repeat at my desk today. sorry to my coworkers but it is legally a national holiday and i will be dancing in my swivel chair.

    12575311K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.7x their median

    just closed the work laptop and opened the personal laptop (for different lights, obviously). now i'm just staring at the pinned tweet wondering if we’ll actually make it to 3.5k likes or if monday morning is about to be the most awkward eye-contact of my life with my boss. enjoy your weekend.

    896534.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.5x their median

    you don't need a second monitor you just need to close the 47 tabs of things you were never going to read. https://t.co/RtITZmXGXQ

    787919.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    checking my bank account on monday morning is basically a horror movie at this point. 😭

    7553011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    seeing college kids move into dorms and remembering when my biggest stress was an 8 am sociology class and not my cholesterol. https://t.co/hbKBznixMM

    8120010K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 316K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 0.627% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is RadioShack's engagement rate on X?
RadioShack (@RadioShackUSA) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 315,950 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, RadioShack sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RadioShackUSA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RadioShackUSA post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going