Back to @RNR_0's profile

Romano engagement report

@RNR_0 - 158K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 158K followers
Per impression
0.818%
7.5K views on a typical post
Reach
4.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
62
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.818% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Romano's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, Romano sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.699%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,674 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,407 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.699%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 25, 2026168x their median

    JUST IN: Nicki Minaj has reportedly been floated as the next White House press secretary by senior Trump staffers. — TMZ https://t.co/7u5ER7kvrr

    8.9K600640344637K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202695x their median

    Guy on wallstreetbets says he forgot that he had bought 0DTE calls which were up over $400k today before expiring nearly worthless Could be the craziest post I've ever seen on there lmao link: https://t.co/eEkBKgmocI https://t.co/pWAHuFBdEd

    5.3K2402611162.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202666x their median

    1/ An investigation into @The__Solstice, top #3 social trader, and his ties to a massive bundling operation https://t.co/G4dl9dnRCx

    3.0K304459285644K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202640x their median

    The Dutch government aims to cut 25,000 civil servant jobs in an AI-led efficiency drive targeting annual savings of €3.5 billion https://t.co/2T00EL68Il

    1.7K436100229325K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202632x their median

    Arc Mainnet is live. In his opening keynote, Jeremy Allaire frames Arc as the Economic OS for the internet: infrastructure for a world where money, markets, assets, applications, and agents can move and coordinate onchain. The network is open. https://t.co/PXbjuM2MlO

    1.5K26716651138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202626x their median

    Rasmr gets mogged on stream when Cupsey accidentally doxxes himself Rasmr: “Yo, fuck, dude. I’m sorry, bro. I don’t know what to do. We gotta delete the VOD, bro.” Cupsey: “How many viewers saw?” Rasmr: “Like a couple thousand, but I’m deleting the VOD” Cupsey: “Delete that shit, bro!”

    1.4K2613036533K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202623x their median

    Pumpfun’s co-founder, aka “alon” just had his team's internal Telegram chats LEAKED by a whistleblower. It states that Pumpfun's main goal was to maximize addictive trading and fee revenue; similar to that of slot machines. Does this mean the Pumpfun launchpad was an online casino this whole time?

    1.0K12921675139K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202623x their median

    having copytraders is so fucking annoying tell me why I'm supposed to get wicked into valhalla every time I want to buy a coin but I can't sell because then that's dumping on my followers? this shit is straight up nerfing me

    9411943156174K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 202523x their median

    https://t.co/xBW9drfMh0

    1.3K7730976K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202620x their median

    Yeah, I'm not buying anything on Arc after seeing this. https://t.co/GmfIXph4m2

    9545318036212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 0.818% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.

What is Romano's engagement rate on X?
Romano (@RNR_0) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,365 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, Romano sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,674 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RNR_0 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RNR_0 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going