ΛЯIΣᄂ engagement report
@Prolotario1 - 472K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 472K followers, an engagement rate of 0.505%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
ΛЯIΣᄂ's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.505%, ΛЯIΣᄂ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 46% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1089 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 202614x their median
Nổ lốp xong còn mất phanh 😰 Xem mà hồi hộp thót tim luôn! https://t.co/yhPV10o0KP
- Oct 23, 202613x their median
You betta redneckanize!! 🤪 https://t.co/maLEJtQ1JR
- Sep 11, 20268.1x their median
My boy I’ve known for over 10 years has been ghosting me for 2 months because he owes me money💔😔 https://t.co/ydV5c8XqhZ
- Oct 16, 20266.4x their median
Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan: Let's 1st Understand One Thing You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny. So What Exactly Is His Function? His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi. Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points. Why? Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern. Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign. Here's The Tell: The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands. A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years. Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo. The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous. What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures? They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home. Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks. We will dig more into him later. @piersmorgan
- Oct 22, 20265.4x their median
ALERT: Elon Musk invests $1 billion into the parent company of CNN, technically making him an owner of the news outlet.
- Aug 25, 20264.3x their median
Allow Me To Present This Little Nugget: Dolly Parton In April 2020, Dolly Parton made a direct $1,000,000 capital donation to VUMC's research branch. This funding was directly channeled into the development of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, placing the cultural icon at the center of institutional pharmaceutical partnerships alongside the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). Which means This money went directly to academic researchers, specifically the lab of Dr. Mark Denison. You Know What I Find Funny About This? The ironic policy twist during 2020 when the Trump administration halted a long-running National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant to EcoHealth Alliance that had funded bat coronavirus surveillance research that Denison and other scientists noted was critical in predicting and understanding the efficacy of drugs like remdesivir ahead of time. Do you see what D. Trump stepped in front of once he found out the looping in funding from those who claim to be studying a virus that was ultimately financed for "research"? Do you see how these celebrities were planted in the entertainment specifically for your demise? Dolly Parton was raised in the occult by her uncle. She was always bad news from day 1. People have no idea how instrumental she was in the trafficking of children through these 501-C3 organizations. All you have to do is go look at her close relationships with Bill & Hillary Clinton. This will tell you how deep all of this goes. Parton's Dollywood theme park in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, has reportedly served as a front for trafficking operations since its inception in 1986. Dolly Parton's rise to fame was orchestrated by her uncle Bill Owens, a high-ranking Freemason and music industry insider who groomed her for stardom from a young age. I Will See You All Later On Tonight
- Oct 21, 20264.0x their median
BREAKING: Two critical security flaws in PHP, the programming language behind much of the internet, are forcing governments to take websites offline, per the BBC. The flaws were found by AI. Security firm Wiz called them the “most severe vulnerabilities ever discovered” by the technology.
- Sep 17, 20262.9x their median
I just love how Donald Trump fooled congress into thinking their opinion mattered for the new "Crypto Structure Rules". He only set them up to be voted out because he knew they would bury themselves for the midterms thinking they were going to stop his agenda by rejecting his proposal despite giving into every demand. Do You See How Silly They Look Now? Now they are trying to save face thinking their 180 decision to finally pass it will save them come November 3rd. Did you all hear Elizabeth Warren today? Talking about she had her own crypto bill she wanted to pass. We all know if that happened it would have had many loop holes for congress. Josh Hawley knows he messed up. His excuse implied he is clearly aloof on what crypto assets are and what it can do. Now Kirsten Gillibrand and 6 more Democrats want to now commit to passing the Clarity Act. You see how everyone is trying to save their seats? Do they not notice we no longer need them? We no longer want the Washington version of the crypto market bill. The SEC has made it clear and official that we can move on without congressional authorization.
- Aug 22, 20262.7x their median
Jay-Z & Wanda Satterthwaite in photo. Rymir's Satterthwaite mother. She was 15 when Jay-Z got her pregnant. He was pushing 30. This is why he (Jay-Z) didn't want to take that paternity test. Because it would have basically proven a crime was committed. https://t.co/iLiuKJ2uIl
- Sep 19, 20262.7x their median
BREAKING: Israeli or American fighter jets are currently active above Syria, towards the direction of Iran
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 472K followers, an engagement rate of 0.505%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 2.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is ΛЯIΣᄂ's engagement rate on X?
- ΛЯIΣᄂ (@Prolotario1) has an engagement rate of 0.505%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 472,457 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.505%, ΛЯIΣᄂ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Prolotario1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Prolotario1 post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.