Back to @Priyankajit51's profile

Dr.Priyanka Singh engagement report

@Priyankajit51 - 73K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.01%
of 73K followers
Per impression
2.23%
336 views on a typical post
Reach
0.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 336 times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 532x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr.Priyanka Singh's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Dr.Priyanka Singh sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,403 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 28, 2024532x their median

    рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рдорди рдореЗрдВ рдЗрд╕рдХреЛ рджреЗрдЦрдХрд░ рджреЛ рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдЖрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ? https://t.co/1Ww86iLpcg

    1.3K1192.7K154121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026139x their median

    рдЖрдЦрд┐рд╝рд░ рдЗрддрдирд╛ рднреЗрджрднрд╛рд╡ рдХреНрдпреЛрдВ? https://t.co/8WSaCK1EpV

    722339391014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202613x their median

    . рд░рд╛рд╣реБрд▓ рдЧрд╛рдВрдзреА рдХреЗ 'рдЧреВрдВрдЬ' рдХрд╛рд░реНрдпрдХреНрд░рдо рдХреЛ рдЬрдЧрд╣-рдЬрдЧрд╣ рдорд┐рд▓ рд░рд╣реЗ рд░рд┐рд╕реНрдкреЙрдиреНрд╕ рд╕реЗ рдмреАрдЬреЗрдкреА рдореЗрдВ рдРрд╕реА рд╣рд▓рдЪрд▓ рдордЪреА рдХрд┐ рдЬреЛ рдордВрддреНрд░реА рдХрднреА рд░рд╛рд╣реБрд▓ рдкрд░ рдмреЛрд▓рддреЗ рддрдХ рдирд╣реАрдВ рдереЗ, рд╡реЗ рднреА рдЕрдЪрд╛рдирдХ рдкреНрд░рд╡рдХреНрддрд╛ рдмрди рдЧрдПред рдРрд╕рд╛ рд▓рдЧ рд░рд╣рд╛ рд╣реИ рдЬреИрд╕реЗ рдКрдкрд░ рд╕реЗ рдЖрджреЗрд╢ рдЖрдпрд╛ рд╣реЛ- "рд╕рдм рд░рд╛рд╣реБрд▓ рдХреЗ рдкреАрдЫреЗ рд▓рдЧ рдЬрд╛рдУ, рдорд╛рдорд▓рд╛ рдХрдВрдЯреНрд░реЛрд▓ рдХрд░реЛ ЁЯШВЁЯШГ

    8915301.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.4x their median

    . рд╢рд┐рд╡рд╕реЗрдирд╛ (UBT) рдиреЗрддрд╛ рдЖрджрд┐рддреНрдп рдард╛рдХрд░реЗ рдиреЗ CEC рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрд╢ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рдХреЗ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлреЗ рдХреА рдорд╛рдВрдЧ рдХреАред рдЙрдиреНрд╣реЛрдВрдиреЗ рдХрд╣рд╛ рдХрд┐ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╣реЛрдиреЗ рдкрд░ 2 рдЕрдХреНрдЯреВрдмрд░ рд╕реЗ рдореБрдВрдмрдИ рдореЗрдВ рдмрдбрд╝рд╛ рдкреНрд░рджрд░реНрд╢рди рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ред рд╡рд┐рдкрдХреНрд╖ SIR рдФрд░ рдорддрджрд╛рддрд╛ рд╕реВрдЪреА рдХреЛ рд▓реЗрдХрд░ рд╕рд╡рд╛рд▓ рдЙрдард╛ рд░рд╣рд╛ рд╣реИред рдЬрдмрдХрд┐ рдЖрдпреЛрдЧ рдиреЗ рдлреИрд╕рд▓реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдкреНрд░рдХреНрд░рд┐рдпрд╛ рдХреЗ рдЕрдиреБрд╕рд╛рд░ рдмрддрд╛рдпрд╛ рд╣реИред

    29600495 viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.3x their median

    . рдкреВрд░реНрд╡ рд╕реБрдкреНрд░реАрдо рдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдЬрдЬ рдорд╛рд░реНрдХрдВрдбреЗрдп рдХрд╛рдЯрдЬреВ рдиреЗ рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрд╢ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рдкрд░ рдЯрд┐рдкреНрдкрдгреА рдХрд░рддреЗ рд╣реБрдП рдХрд╣рд╛.. рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрд╢ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рд╕реЗ рдкреВрдЫрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдирд╛ рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдП тАЬрддреВ рдЗрдзрд░ рдЙрдзрд░ рдХреА рдмрд╛рдд рдирд╛ рдХрд░ рдпреЗ рдмрддрд╛ рдХрд╛рдлрд╝рд┐рд▓рд╛ рдХреНрдпреЛрдВ рд▓реВрдЯрд╛ ?

    29500791 viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 20264.0x their median

    . рдзрд░реНрдореЗрдВрджреНрд░ рдкреНрд░рдзрд╛рди рдХреЗ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлреЗ рд╕реЗ рдкрд╣рд▓реЗ рд╢рд┐рдХреНрд╖рд╛ рдордВрддреНрд░рд╛рд▓рдп рдореЗрдВ рдЖрдЧ рд▓рдЧреА рдереА рдЕрдм рдЧреГрд╣ рдордВрддреНрд░рд╛рд▓рдп рдореЗрдВ рдЖрдЧ рд▓рдЧрдиреЗ рд╕реЗ рд╕рд╡рд╛рд▓ рдЙрда рд░рд╣реЗ рд╣реИрдВ рдХрд┐ рдЖрдЦрд┐рд░ рдХреМрди-рд╕реА рдлрд╛рдЗрд▓реЗрдВ рдЬрд▓рд╛рдИ рдЬрд╛ рд░рд╣реА рд╣реИрдВ? рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдзрд░реНрдореЗрдВрджреНрд░ рдкреНрд░рдзрд╛рди рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рдж рдЕрдорд┐рдд рд╢рд╛рд╣ рдХреЗ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлреЗ рдХреА рддреИрдпрд╛рд░реА рд╣реИ?

    26510444 viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.6x their median

    Gen-Z рдХреА рд╡рдЬрд╣ рд╕реЗ...рдмреЗрд░реЛрдЬрдЧрд╛рд░реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдХреЙрдХрд░реЛрдЪ рдмреЛрд▓рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рдХреЗ рд╕реБрд░ рдХреИрд╕реЗ рдмрджрд▓ рдЧрдП? https://t.co/qVpp0H3Yaa

    19640514 viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.4x their median

    . рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреЗ рдмреИрдВрдХ рдкрд╣рд▓реЗ рд╣реА рдХрд░реАрдм 2 рд▓рд╛рдЦ рдХрд░реЛрдбрд╝ рд░реБрдкрдпреЗ рдХрд╛ рдореБрдирд╛рдлрд╛ рдХрдорд╛ рд░рд╣реЗ рд╣реИрдВред рдРрд╕реЗ рдореЗрдВ UPI рдкрд░ рдХрд┐рд╕реА рднреА рддрд░рд╣ рдХрд╛ рд╢реБрд▓реНрдХ рд▓рдЧрд╛рдирд╛ рдЖрдо рднрд╛рд░рддреАрдпреЛрдВ рдкрд░ рдЕрддрд┐рд░рд┐рдХреНрдд рдмреЛрдЭ рдбрд╛рд▓рдиреЗ рдЬреИрд╕рд╛ рд╣реИред рдпрд╣ рд╕реАрдзреЗ рддреМрд░ рдкрд░ рдЬрдирддрд╛ рд╕реЗ рдЯреИрдХреНрд╕ рд╡рд╕реВрд▓рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд╕рдорд╛рди рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ред --рдЕрд╢рдиреАрд░ рдЧреНрд░реЛрд╡рд░, рднрд╛рд░рддрдкреЗ рдХреЗ рдлрд╛рдЙрдВрдбрд░

    24210385 viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.9x their median

    . SC рдиреЗ рд╕рдВрднрд▓ рд╣рд┐рдВрд╕рд╛ рдорд╛рдорд▓реЗ рдореЗрдВ рдореБрд▓реНрд▓рд╛ рдЕрдлрд░реЛрдЬ рдХреА NSA рд╣рд┐рд░рд╛рд╕рдд рд░рджреНрдж рдХрд░ рджреАред рдФрд░ рдЙрддреНрддрд░ рдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢ рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдкрд░ тВ╣10 рд▓рд╛рдЦ рдХрд╛ рдЬреБрд░реНрдорд╛рдирд╛ рд▓рдЧрд╛рдпрд╛ рдЕрджрд╛рд▓рдд рдХреЗ рдлреИрд╕рд▓реЗ рд╕реЗ рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдХреА рдХрд╛рд░реНрд░рд╡рд╛рдИ рдкрд░ рдЧрдВрднреАрд░ рдХрд╛рдиреВрдиреА рд╕рд╡рд╛рд▓ рдЦрдбрд╝реЗ рд╣реБрдП рд╣реИрдВ?

    20300352 viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.5x their median

    . CJP рдХрд╛ рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрд╢ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рдХреЗ рдЦрд┐рд▓рд╛рдл рдореЛрд░реНрдЪрд╛, 48 рдШрдВрдЯреЗ рдореЗрдВ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлреЗ рдХрд╛ рдЕрд▓реНрдЯреАрдореЗрдЯрдо рдЕрднрд┐рдЬреАрдд рджрд┐рдкрдХреЗ рдмреЛрд▓реЗ-рд╡реЛрдЯрд░ рд▓рд┐рд╕реНрдЯ рд╕реЗ 13 рдХрд░реЛрдбрд╝ рдирд╛рдо рд╣рдЯрд╛рдиреЗ рдкрд░ рдЙрдареЗ рдЧрдВрднреАрд░ рд╕рд╡рд╛рд▓ рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдиреЗрд╢ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рдХрд╛ рдЗрд╕реНрддреАрдлрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╣реБрдЖ рддреЛ рджреЗрд╢рднрд░ рдореЗрдВ рдХрд░реЗрдВрдЧреЗ рдЖрдВрджреЛрд▓рди

    18200705 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 336 times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 532x its own typical post.

What is Dr.Priyanka Singh's engagement rate on X?
Dr.Priyanka Singh (@Priyankajit51) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 73,012 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Dr.Priyanka Singh sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Priyankajit51 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Priyankajit51 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going