Back to @PirateWires's profile

Pirate Wires engagement report

@PirateWires - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.298%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
1.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
69
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.27/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.298% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 573x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pirate Wires's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Pirate Wires sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 472 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 2026573x their median

    Enough of this renaming lakes and gulfs. We got to the moon first. The moon shall henceforth be known as the MOON OF AMERICA.

    34K2.0K1.8K323771K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202649x their median

    Nithya Raman is getting TORCHED by her own colleagues as she tries to lie about her unmitigated failure as chair of the Homelessness and Housing Committee. “You ran it like a lecture hall at a university, not a place of government”. Nithya is a scammer who ruined our city. https://t.co/kjNg5ZQ9Ra

    4.7K8714010112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202664x their median

    As someone who now employs 20somethings, I often think about how nuts it was that my drug-addicted Vice bosses let me... edit a billion dollar website from my dorm room. I wrote about the insanity and lessons I learned from my Vice days for @PirateWires https://t.co/zFUHXnsarj

    3.9K19934321.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202636x their median

    We finally get flying cars, and somehow that's fascist too. Imagine being so poisoned by the internet that you can’t enjoy anything anymore. https://t.co/PnXcdR4krE

    2.0K25512914361K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202633x their median

    In less than a decade, the internet went from free and open to one of the most heavily moderated spaces in public life. Beginning in 2015, every major platform created strict, but extremely vague and opaque, ideological content rules backed up by a colossal moderation and censorship apparatus. NGOs, the US government, and foreign actors (notably, the EU) helped. Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on speech policing, which often went by the Orwellian term “trust and safety.” The scale of censorship has no precedent. Tens of millions of accounts were suppressed or banned. Billions of posts were removed. A professional historian could spend their entire career chronicling it. McCarthyism is taught in schools, and online censorship of the 2010s is orders of magnitude larger than McCarthyism ever was. Here, a full history chronicling exactly how major platforms (YouTube, Twitter, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook) silenced dissident speech, from @arctotherium42 👇

    1.7K4363637110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202630x their median

    California’s Democratic nominee for governor, Xavier Becerra, as head of HHS, once led the department responsible for a child-migrant facility costing $92,608 per cot — and it may have sent kids to trafficking rings. The facility cost taxpayers $782 million. Roughly 8,450 unaccompanied migrant children passed through in under a year. Its job was to care for kids and place them with safe “sponsors” (family members or other relatives). According to interviews obtained by Pirate Wires, the facility prioritized speed over safety. A case manager said sponsors submitted obviously fake IDs, and ID checks were “routinely ignored.” Another worker allegedly raised alarm bells about ~200 migrant kids who’d gone to a single location; when this worker contacted a child trafficking hotline, they were promptly fired. A separate investigation by Chuck Grassley found that HHS, under Becerra’s watch, sent kids home with sponsors tied to MS-13. And a 2023 New York Times investigation found that some kids were released to trafficking rings, where they ended up cleaning slaughterhouses, suffering chemical burns, or performing hard labor prohibited for minors (in some cases, children died). Becerra is leading in the polls. He brands himself the “safe choice” given his 30-plus years in government
 and claims to “protect” “marginalized communities.” 
But his record tells a very different story. Our full investigation, via @nicolewizman1 👇

    1.3K5823471216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202626x their median

    In the 2010s, VICE was peak hipster American culture. The brand was known for loudly breaking taboos. Its cofounder, Gavin McInnes, would go on to found the Proud Boys and get banned from basically every social media platform for “hate speech.” By the mid-2010s, what began as an alt magazine in Montreal had landed an HBO show and convinced Rupert Murdoch and Disney to invest. It was, at one point, worth almost $6 billion. A decade later, it was bankrupt. @BCC_Mitchell, the youngest employee at Vice in 2012, takes us inside their rise and fall — from drug-fueled editorial meetings, to the CEO throwing $1m in cash at staff during a holiday party, to the team starting to chase ‘woke’ for clicks
 
to, eventually, the CEO himself abandoning what made the company famous in the first place. “Vice was a cult,” Mitchell writes. “It was also the best business school on Earth.” Below, the deepest insider profile yet of a 2010s media giant 👇

    1.5K11544691.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202623x their median

    When did modern feminism go from fighting for women’s equality to absolving them of any and all responsibility? https://t.co/YwTlIR4P0t

    1.3K15252952K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202623x their median

    Democrats are openly talking about jailing Elon Musk as soon as they retake power. @micsolana on how American politics became a blood feud — on both sides — that's only getting worse. https://t.co/rOYr3NyiRB

    1.2K2321061857K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202618x their median

    When the FCC approved Starlink’s second-gen satellites, environmental groups took the agency to court, alleging “diminishment in the enjoyment of the dark sky.” When Starlink wanted to lower its satellites, a competitor made bogus claims about space debris. No more. Now, the FCC is ending this kind of NIMBYism by eliminating its environmental reviews for space tech. Full story from @JonasYDu 👇

    9981224022105K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 69 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.298% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 573x its own typical post.

What is Pirate Wires's engagement rate on X?
Pirate Wires (@PirateWires) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,602,280 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Pirate Wires sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PirateWires have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PirateWires post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going