Back to @PeterDiamandis's profile

Peter H. Diamandis, MD engagement report

@PeterDiamandis - 422K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.177%
of 422K followers
Per impression
2.69%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
6.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
744
interactions (median)
Saved
0.146%
40 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.57/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 744 interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.177%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 207 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202625x their median

    Everyone knows the trillion-dollar version of SpaceX. Almost nobody remembers that Elon's first rocket failed three times, and there was money for exactly only one more attempt. DO NOT be afraid to fail.

    18K570203401.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202610x their median

    The best longevity advice right now is embarrassingly simple: sleep 8 hours, move your body, eat real food, manage your stress, and cultivate an optimistic mindset. Don't die from something stupid.

    6.8K60222669234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.0x their median

    The phone in your pocket has vastly more raw computing power, memory, and storage than the Apollo Guidance Computer that helped land humans on the Moon in 1969.

    5.5K24521018375K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.9x their median

    I do not want more years because I am afraid of dying. I want them because I am not finished being curious, and curiosity is the one appetite that has never once shrunk with age.

    5.2K28832742171K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.1x their median

    Elon predicted 100x gains in AI intelligence at fixed model size. It was at the edge of plausibility when he said it. Turns out it's now a fact. We are nowhere near the ceiling.

    4.9K20311315353K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.1x their median

    Most of what is frightening you about the future was probably written by people with no intention of building any of it.

    3.9K49119531537K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.0x their median

    If AI gave you back 2 hours a day, that's 730 hours a year. What would you do with them? Spend more time with your kids? Get healthy? Start the business you've been putting off? That's the conversation about the future of tech I want to have. What becomes possible when people get part of their lives back?

    2.7K35260289532K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.5x their median

    While pessimism sounds smart, optimism makes money by turning life-changing technologies into reality.

    2.7K36822130365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.1x their median

    Reusable rockets broke the cost curve, and when the price of orbit collapses, we're going to open an entire economy above your head. Welcome to [soon] to space.

    2.0K136140756.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    Optimists live 11–15% longer and are far more likely to reach age 85. That's not a motivational poster... If you don't believe me, it's peer-reviewed research on a study of 70,000+ people.

    1.8K1719847325K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 744 interactions against 422K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Peter H. Diamandis, MD's engagement rate on X?
Peter H. Diamandis, MD (@PeterDiamandis) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 422,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.177%, Peter H. Diamandis, MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @PeterDiamandis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @PeterDiamandis post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going