Nicholas J. Fuentes engagement report
@NickJFuentes - 1.3M followers on X
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 160K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nicholas J. Fuentes's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.401%, Nicholas J. Fuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 20% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 6, 202620x their median
If Trump deports Sneako and Hasan Piker I will vote straight Republican in the midterms.
- Jul 7, 202619x their median
Muslims cry about Western colonialism and genocide, then scream that Islam will dominate the world and gloat about White Genocide in the next sentence. They deserve ZERO sympathy. I’m done.
- Oct 1, 202615x their median
Jane Doe, the Cornell Slut, should be imprisoned for falsely accusing the 7 of rape.
- Sep 13, 202614x their median
https://t.co/55u5sfisI9
- Oct 26, 202612x their median
Trump promised “no new wars,” then started a war with Iran that we are not only losing but which also destroyed the economy. Meanwhile, his corrupt advisors are selling their access to him for millions of dollars to megadonors and foreign countries. Stay home or vote Democrat.
- Sep 8, 202612x their median
The UAE confirmed what we’ve already known for almost 3 years, which is that Netanyahu sat on detailed intelligence warning of the October 7th attack, probably because he wanted it to happen. October 7th was the manufactured pretext for a regional war to build Greater Israel.
- Oct 2, 202611x their median
Twitter is doing to “rape culture” what body cameras did to “police brutality.”
- Aug 21, 202611x their median
Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children to death & Candace Owens says she is “obviously not guilty” because big pharma made her do it. Now women are lining the streets to cheer for the murderer as she arrives in court after they raised $1,000,000 for her. This is pure evil.
- Jul 7, 202613x their median
Allah could not save Egypt from Messi. CONQUERED BY WHITE EXCELLENCE… AGAIN
- Jul 20, 202618x their median
Trump feels totally irrelevant now. Nobody cared about his speech on the Fourth of July for America 250 and nobody cared about his “primetime address” on Thursday about voter fraud. He blew it and now he’s already a lame duck.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.401%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 160K times each, and 3.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.
- What is Nicholas J. Fuentes's engagement rate on X?
- Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) has an engagement rate of 0.401%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,299,817 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.401%, Nicholas J. Fuentes sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NickJFuentes have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NickJFuentes post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.