NepentheZ engagement report
@NepentheZ - 889K followers on X
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 408 interactions against 889K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.803% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 49x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #saddlers, #uts.
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #saddlers, #uts.
Compared with accounts its own size
NepentheZ's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.046%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.694% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 27% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 202649x their median
#thfc ⚪️ Omar Marmoush fee is expected to be £59M. The same fee City paid to get him from Frankfurt. This is because Eintracht Frankfurt a 15% sell on clause for any PROFIT made on Marmoush by City. This is why Spurs paid more money for Savinho. The agreement is a DOUBLE DEAL. 🤝🇧🇷🇪🇬
- Oct 11, 202627x their median
Gravenberch off for the WEAKEST Red I've seen in a while. Add it to the list. #116
- Aug 19, 202627x their median
From Bronze to 90 rated in 8 years 🔥 What a journey 👏 https://t.co/wr0fZk9Vni
- Oct 22, 202624x their median
🚨Bukayo Saka has undergone a scan on the thigh injury he picked up yesterday against Bayern Munich. If it’s a grade one strain, the winger will be out for around two weeks. If it’s a grade two tear, Bukayo Saka will likely return around Christmas. Considering the winger walked out of the Allianz Arena without crutches, a grade three tear is unlikely.
- Aug 18, 202624x their median
How is Cubarsi higher rated? 🤔 Garcia is better in EVERY stat but DRI 💀 https://t.co/h5WKRBHRIX
- Oct 12, 202614x their median
simple GPS functionality https://t.co/cm1XRu71ee
- Sep 20, 202612x their median
The "Gold re-roll" Streamlined SBC is unreal, especially for coins / tradable card value. Gold 75 discards at 533 Coins Gold 83 discards at 589 Coins Gold 75 = 90 Gems Gold 83 = 410 Gems Gold 83 to purchase = 650/700 Coins Constantly selling / quick selling unsellable gold cards to enable you to buy 83 rated golds makes this 78+ x2 SBC come in at 2,150 - 2,300 coins. You need 3x 83s and 1x Bronze. That's INSANE value for a 78+ x2, especially this early in the game cycle! You're also guaranteed 280 Gem value back as a bare minimum!
- Oct 21, 20269.6x their median
I've not got a single Rivals point yet this week and not sure I will. I was SO motivated to grind FC27 at the start of the year, play every champs, every rivals and just complete it all.... BUT.... once again the time Vs reward ratio in Rivals and Champs falls flat.
- Aug 20, 20267.9x their median
Savinho being sold for £80m is just incomprehensable. The guy barely gets minues, is below bang average and is being sold for a HUGE profit. Mean while, we can't ship a player for a bag of freddos.
- Oct 18, 20266.6x their median
🤐 #Saddlers | #UTS https://t.co/i541gNDnrB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 408 interactions against 889K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 0.803% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 49x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #saddlers, #uts.
- What is NepentheZ's engagement rate on X?
- NepentheZ (@NepentheZ) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 888,892 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.046%, NepentheZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @NepentheZ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @NepentheZ post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.