Back to @Mollyploofkins's profile

Molly Ploofkins engagement report

@Mollyploofkins - 164K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.09%
of 164K followers
Per impression
13.0%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
8.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.102%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 13.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Molly Ploofkins's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.09%, Molly Ploofkins sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202649x their median

    Well done, America. We have reached the bottom. https://t.co/6RJOYAENvq

    78K6.3K2.3K6932.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202615x their median

    Jared Kushner exposed for taking bribes from Saudi and UAE https://t.co/72C131LYie

    20K5.8K401259725K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    Regimes that have restricted press freedom: • Nazi Germany (1933–1945) • Soviet Union under Stalin (1924–1953) • North Korea (1948–present) • Franco’s Spain (1939–1975) • Mussolini’s Fascist Italy (1922–1943) • Pinochet’s Chile (1973–1990) • Communist Cuba (1959–present) • Putin’s Russia (2000–present) • The Trump Reich (2017–2021; 2025–present)

    18K6.5K1.1K174329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202512x their median

    Trump is seen with a large patch of foundation covering his hand. https://t.co/mGvdBfJTre

    12K1.2K1.9K6.5K123M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202610x their median

    Hitler and other top Nazis inspect a scale model of a planned triumphal arch in Berlin, circa 1939. https://t.co/UmFKURIu4M

    12K5.5K309373292K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20268.0x their median

    MAGA fuck face, Scott Presler, who has routinely accused Democrats of voter fraud, has been accused of allowing at least three people unrelated to him and who do not live with him to use his Pennsylvania home address to cast their ballots in 2024. https://t.co/eXT9lSQqXZ

    10K3.3K377170118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.9x their median

    Natalie Harp is feeding Trump a carefully curated stream of propaganda—and it’s influencing presidential actions. Who, exactly, is holding her accountable? https://t.co/P2zjJKyWyI

    9.0K2.4K764151122K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20266.7x their median

    Kushner won’t sue Vanity Fair for the same reason Melania never sued Hunter for suggesting that Epstein introduced her to Trump.

    10K1.4K491784K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20264.1x their median

    Trump: "I saw Barack Hussein Obama in Michigan today. The place was empty." Reality... Left: The in-person crowd. Right: The overflow crowd. https://t.co/dY1MouGVny

    5.6K1.6K1085473K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.6x their median

    Shit posting by Natalie while Trump golfs https://t.co/CdDsiIPkt7

    5.2K97719251111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 1.09%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 13.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

What is Molly Ploofkins's engagement rate on X?
Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) has an engagement rate of 1.09%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 164,396 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.09%, Molly Ploofkins sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mollyploofkins have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Mollyploofkins post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going