MindShift engagement report
@MindShiftKQED - 416K followers on X
Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 416K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.314% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.689% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 167 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
MindShift's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, MindShift sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.695% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 5% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 95% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Nov 8, 202219x their median
🔎 In case you are looking to follow MindShift on different platforms here's where you can find us! 📧 Start with signing up for our newsletter for weekly updates on the future of learning: https://t.co/RzMYgDkiVV https://t.co/ro2DmWWSXd
- Aug 19, 202610x their median
When a student has memorized key foundational information, they free up their working memory to tackle high-order thinking. @edutopia https://t.co/czw3JQZtEH
- Aug 31, 20264.9x their median
High school teacher Chanea Bond says going almost entirely analog is the best way she’s found to keep generative artificial intelligence out of her classes. https://t.co/Xe8jJiEDYB
- Sep 4, 20263.7x their median
It is a well-established, indisputable fact that students must trust their teacher for ambitious learning to happen. There are ways teachers can demonstrate their trust in students, too. @ASCD https://t.co/9ejdXikLiq
- Sep 12, 20263.6x their median
Sketchnote by Sylvia Duckworth https://t.co/wieBrCyoCj
- Sep 3, 20263.4x their median
Sometimes, simply asking students, “What do you wonder?” and giving them time to develop and share questions is the perfect way to start. @edutopia https://t.co/H4ekeWrMnm
- Aug 22, 20263.3x their median
As educators in the nation's second-largest district prepare for the new limits on classroom screen time, some teachers say it will be a difficult adjustment. https://t.co/thOsipAglH
- Aug 22, 20263.3x their median
Sketchnote by @tnvora https://t.co/k3Cr49PJ91
- Sep 2, 20263.2x their median
Reciprocal teaching engages students using comprehension strategies to make sense of a text. It can help teachers meet a range of needs in the classroom. @Catlin_Tucker https://t.co/Ps787atfua
- Aug 30, 20263.1x their median
Today, some educators and parents are beginning to ask whether laptops, tablets and educational software changed classrooms in ways they never intended. https://t.co/nRo36onphA
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 416K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.314% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.689% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 167 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
- What is MindShift's engagement rate on X?
- MindShift (@MindShiftKQED) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 81 original posts from the last 30 days against 415,795 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, MindShift sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MindShiftKQED have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MindShiftKQED post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.