Back to @MightyKeef's profile

Mightykeef engagement report

@MightyKeef - 144K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.782%
of 144K followers
Per impression
3.48%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
22.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.1%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.782%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #marveltĹŤkon.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mightykeef's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.782%, Mightykeef sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.697% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,805 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,448 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 93 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 202614x their median

    Shuhei Yoshida and Adam Boyes recreate their iconic disc swapping meme at Tokyo Game Show Only this time they swap air 🥹 https://t.co/U8wLA2wILG

    14K1.2K8183417K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.4x their median

    I appreciate that, Ava. https://t.co/hSswjq2tPk

    5.7K243751393K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.1x their median

    Everyone playing Fire Emblem while Amazon threw my copy into the Amazon. https://t.co/Sukdl5jRNv

    5.4K2587313192K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.6x their median

    Fuck you Amazon https://t.co/8pvVe5zrCg

    5.0K881068136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.9x their median

    11 years ago, Super Smash Bros 4 released for the 3ds. It was the first time a smash game came out on 3DS. It was also the first time I ever uploaded a skit on youtube. I had no idea this one video would eventually bless me with the career I have today or the amazing community that continues to watch me. Thank you all for being a part of this journey so far❤️.

    4.1K22058053K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    Justice https://t.co/jNSzTloeeJ

    3.9K9958343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    I’m legit about to rob the next person showing they got Fire Emblem early. I’m no longer kidding.

    3.6K22246052K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.0x their median

    Amazon you will burn in hell https://t.co/uisYJTiiD5

    3.2K5415210195K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.4x their median

    Alcohol, Fire Emblem, World of Warcraft and Resident Evil movie. Weekend about to be insane https://t.co/Pq8MrTMLVY

    2.6K7246354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.2x their median

    What if it isn’t rage bait? What if it’s that person’s genuine dog shit opinion? What then?

    2.3K105811251K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#marveltĹŤkon

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.782%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Mightykeef's engagement rate on X?
Mightykeef (@MightyKeef) has an engagement rate of 0.782%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,920 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.782%, Mightykeef sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MightyKeef have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MightyKeef post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going