Back to @MichaelLucasNYC's profile

Michael Lucas ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ engagement report

@MichaelLucasNYC - 291K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.097%
of 291K followers
Per impression
2.11%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
4.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
282
interactions (median)
Saved
0.614%
82 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 282 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 2.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, Michael Lucas ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 22, 20265.6x their median

    ๐—™๐—จ๐—–๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š @TH4YLER_ ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ This Puerto Rican muscle stud came in saying โ€˜versatileโ€™ โ€” but he left as my personal bottom boy. ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/ng0yesNGf4 ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI Watch him surrender. https://t.co/WBLOjOKbqD

    1.3K2182059K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 20265.1x their median

    I BOTTOMED FOR A LATINO TWINK @ENNGIE_53 Purchase full scene on: ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI https://t.co/clrrtBAzOj

    1.2K16413155K viewsView on X
  • Feb 16, 20264.8x their median

    New photo. Getting bigger https://t.co/G8Bemmum5k

    1.2K14646087K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.6x their median

    A perfect storm: handsome, intense, and hung. ๐Ÿ”ฅ Meet @Chris_fe27๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐—ช๐—”๐—ง๐—–๐—› ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ช! ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/ng0yesNGf4 ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI https://t.co/W18JOrV65E

    8821283049K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.2x their median

    ๐—™๐—จ๐—–๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š @TH4YLER_ ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ This Puerto Rican muscle stud came in saying โ€˜versatileโ€™ โ€” but he left as my personal bottom boy. ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/ng0yesNGf4 ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI Watch him surrender. https://t.co/LRiT1k4JtC

    556682019K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 20261.7x their median

    I BOTTOMED FOR A LATINO TWINK @ENNGIE_53 Purchase full scene on: ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI https://t.co/45oMu1DSlu

    426533134K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.6x their median

    Who says two tops canโ€™t have fun? Itโ€™s all about chemistry and knowing how to take control. https://t.co/ng0yesNGf4 https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI with @TheOnlyWoodyFox ๐ŸฆŠ https://t.co/o3ycTlvaEJ

    394416016K viewsView on X
  • May 24, 20261.6x their median

    I BOTTOMED FOR A LATINO TWINK @ENNGIE_53 Purchase full scene on:๐Ÿ’ฆ ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿงจ โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI https://t.co/IBTbf5Am0I

    376556020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    ๐Ÿ”ฅ Took this uncut Latino @Hey_Morrillo both ways ๐Ÿ”ฅ But if all you care about is watching me bottomโ€ฆ that partโ€™s sold separately ๐Ÿ˜ The scene is up on: ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI You know what to do... WATCH NOW! https://t.co/ttrClm0EKX

    277382015K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 2026

    ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Gorgeous Latin stud @vicgioz This one is a must-watch ๐Ÿงจ ๐Ÿงจ ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/ng0yesNGf4 ๐Ÿ”ต https://t.co/F6dbuIBfzp โšซ https://t.co/7ABe81cuGI https://t.co/kbNsewTE4u

    282263012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 282 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 2.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Michael Lucas ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate on X?
Michael Lucas ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@MichaelLucasNYC) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 290,734 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, Michael Lucas ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MichaelLucasNYC have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @MichaelLucasNYC post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going