Back to @Melt_Dem's profile

Meltem Demirors engagement report

@Melt_Dem - 322K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 322K followers
Per impression
0.601%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
5.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.092%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Meltem Demirors's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, Meltem Demirors sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 319 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 7, 202681x their median

    "Make him obsessed with math. Make him obsessed with computers. Then build a computer that solves every math problem, and force him to sit on the beach getting drunk." https://t.co/zuaVMhGC2u

    7.4K4603533104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202640x their median

    Dude you know those pesky securitization rules that went in place after the 2008 financial meltdown? Well, the SEC just exempted datacenter debt from key securitization rules The SEC said a major subset of data-center securitizations don’t need to have disclosures and investor protections that similar deals require. That includes risk retention, a requirement that companies issuing asset-backed securities retain some of the debt to better align their interests with investors. (Bloomberg)

    3.0K71665192342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202637x their median

    Anthropic marketing: We built a god only we can control and gave it a “wet lab” Muse marketing: Heyy girl I know you have dozens of unpaid parking tickets. Let’s get that cleaned up

    3.5K1213014156K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    its still so underrated the degree to which our intelligence supercycle was as much reliant on innovations in capital formation as it was innovations in the technology itself. europe is losing not only because they can't built it, but primarily because they can't finance it https://t.co/U3SjXiOMpz

    1.1K923032152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20269.5x their median

    “[REDACTED]’s watch was a [REDACTED] Men’s Automatic Analog Watch. [REDACTED] walked back to the vehicle to check his phone, which displayed 12:40am. [REDACTED] noted the discrepancy, compared the time displayed on his watch to the time displayed on his phone and observed that the time on his watch was 25 minutes ahead of the time on his phone and the vehicle’s digital clock. [REDACTED] relayed the discrepancy to [REDACTED], whose digital watch displayed the same time as the phones and vehicle clock.” 🤔 https://t.co/dieMmXLGWW

    7521024826106K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20269.3x their median

    personal agents, the end of friction, economic consequences of finally getting around to it https://t.co/jEOtEaFvbx

    744598526192K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.5x their median

    Atheists frequently misunderstand that religious indoctrination does not aim to impose propositional beliefs, but to install agents. To believe in God is not a belief, it is a psychological configuration in which the personal self shares the mind with another agent.

    652431171956K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20268.1x their median

    the level of schadenfreude around situational awareness / leopold is sad let the man cook, he's having a generational run and even if he loses 80% of his book, he'll end the year with better numbers than most HF managers will ever print.

    710195411117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20265.2x their median

    narrative violation: crypto native founders are building the compute frontier neoclouds @CoreWeave @CrusoeAI @Hut8Corp @TeraWulfInc @togethercompute token markets @OpenRouter @PrimeIntellect @hyperbolic_labs agent / harness @NousResearch @AskVenice more to come 🫶

    4153549754K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.3x their median

    finally had time to digest @drmichaellevin's paper, Ingressing Minds deeply inspiring perspective - physical systems (incl our bodies) are not intelligence itself but the instrument through which a larger space of intelligence becomes accessible. over the last 10 years, i've become a firm believer in non-human intelligence (NHI) and non-localized consciousness, through personal experiences and interactions with pioneers in these domains. as we summon beings from the void, there is a spiritual and philosophical contemplation required that i fear we are sorely missing in our conversations about intelligence today. https://t.co/HG5pJvGJPr

    3742723219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.

What is Meltem Demirors's engagement rate on X?
Meltem Demirors (@Melt_Dem) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 322,342 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, Meltem Demirors sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Melt_Dem have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Melt_Dem post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going