Max ππ³ engagement report
@MaxGGs - 100K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 4.08%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 9.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 47% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Max ππ³'s engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 4.08%, Max ππ³ sits above the 90th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.61% to 83.0%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 26, 20264.2x their median
completely normal reaction to winning a dress to impress game πβοΈ https://t.co/doReirBjWq
- May 22, 20264.1x their median
I WILL BE PLAYING DRESS TO IMPRESS WITH THE QSMP ON TUESDAY IDK HOW THIS HAPPENED AGAIN LOL BUT THEY WERE KIND ENOUGH TO INVITE ME! YAY! https://t.co/rEn25ndls9
- Oct 20, 20264.0x their median
me watching harry tubbo and katie do roleplay together on the qsmp tomorrow https://t.co/kYrMIIzO1w
- Jun 1, 20263.7x their median
happy pride month⦠racontez-moi vos coming out je suis curieux https://t.co/4c8soc2ySh
- Sep 1, 20263.4x their median
applying for the streamer awards and i feel like that fucking picture of lizzo π https://t.co/L4q625IlUX
- Oct 16, 20263.2x their median
IM A FUCKING RISING STAR PLEASE VOTE FOR ME PLEASE VOTING OUT NOW https://t.co/sDzX25Isxt
- May 1, 20262.2x their median
THANKS FOR HAVING ME QSMP HAHAHAAH I DIDNT MEAN TO JOIN FOR MORE THAN 5 MINS πππ POLSKA GUROM π΅π±
- Aug 28, 20262.5x their median
MIDOFFS FREESTYLE (FT HAX AND DERAPCHU) π https://t.co/pVbeSYMuav
- Jul 9, 20262.4x their median
IM JOINING LIFESTEAL SEASON 8 NO FUCKING WAYYYYY THANK YOU @PangiLive @derapchu @ashswagin @hannahxxrose @therealsquiddo @MinuteTech_ @PrinceZamLIVE @JumperWho @SB_737 @spokeishere @Poafa2 @KatieGoBrr @clown_pierce WE ARE LIFESTEALLLLL https://t.co/Ct1TIjvPBt
- Aug 23, 20262.2x their median
TOMORROW. 6PM BST / 1PM EST. https://t.co/k42e5rhFC9
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 4.08%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 9.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 42.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 47% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.
- What is Max ππ³'s engagement rate on X?
- Max ππ³ (@MaxGGs) has an engagement rate of 4.08%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 100,238 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 4.08%, Max ππ³ sits above the 90th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MaxGGs have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MaxGGs post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.