Back to @MaxBlumenthal's profile

Max Blumenthal engagement report

@MaxBlumenthal - 866K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.297%
of 866K followers
Per impression
2.23%
115K views on a typical post
Reach
13.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.087%
100 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.97/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 866K followers, an engagement rate of 0.297%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 115K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Max Blumenthal's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.297%, Max Blumenthal sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.695%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link32% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 330 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20269.3x their median

    “This is how I’m seeing [my husband] Hrysha off [to war]. Lord, save him and keep him safe!” a woman cries, pointing at a bus packed with forcibly mobilized men. As you can see, every one of them is in handcuffs. Zelensky’s Ukraine of the “Four Freedoms” — with freedom arriving, quite literally, in chains.

    15K6.7K1.1K1.2K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.2x their median

    DONT BE WEIRD. AOC doing a bloating check. https://t.co/L6b8brAkbQ

    16K40397866912M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20267.9x their median

    🚨BREAKING: The first image from the ongoing trial of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya before Israel’s Supreme Court in occupied Jerusalem reveals a visibly weakened and exhausted man, bearing apparent signs of torture, abuse, and prolonged mistreatment during his detention.

    8.9K5.8K248201440K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.7x their median

    A preview of what I'm cooking up next. https://t.co/wMwvqfliJW

    12K2.5K39552247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.9x their median

    What you become when you side with Robert Kraft https://t.co/uZDTvgVF0n

    9.1K796831666K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.6x their median

    Shareholders of The New York Times filed a lawsuit today, arguing the paper has failed to meet its most basic obligation: to tell readers the truth and correct itself in a timely fashion when it doesn’t. Exclusive for @TheFP here: https://t.co/jw5nYHLv3m

    7.4K1.6K160171251K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.6x their median

    Now that the left is actually within reach of attaining real power, this kind of antisocial behavioral should be thoroughly shamed. https://t.co/v8X2odMt7M

    7.5K4407815741.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.5x their median

    Was ICE's detention of Milo Yiannopolous a case of weaponization against a political gadfly who'd exposed Laura Loomer? Loomer has explicitly claimed credit for ICE's jailing and impending deportation of Milo, claiming she was first to report his immigration status to the feds, and bragging that he was "Loomered" Milo had become a leading right-wing opponent of Trump's war on Iran, and an outspoken critic of Israel. Loomer implied this was the reason for his targeting by ICE. Left unmentioned was Milo's former friendship and role as Loomer's communications director during her failed run for Congress. He knew her on an intimate basis, and had come to resent her for her alleged personal conduct. Journalist Nina Burleigh reported that Milo accused Loomer of sexually harassing a male staffer on the campaign, claiming it prompted him to quit. Milo has even called Loomer a "rapist." During a 2024 interview with Tim Pool, Milo said he personally witnessed Loomer boasting to friends in Palm Beach that she had performed a "sex act" on Donald Trump. When Bill Maher referenced Milo's story on his HBO show, claiming Trump "might" be "fucking" Loomer, the right-wing propagandist sued the comedian, insisting that he cost her rides on Air Force One, along with the job she yearned for in his administration. According to Burleigh, the judge presiding over Loomer's lawsuit against Maher is "demanding to see her financial information, an order to which she has so far not submitted. Her case is not being helped by 'four White House officials' who recently leaked to Bari Weiss’s Free Press that 'Laura is more trouble than she’s worth' and speculated that she is influenced by lobby firms." During his interview with Tim Pool, Milo said he told Trump allies that Loomer "is not Jewish, she made it up... She ordered a Star of David necklace off the internet." Milo went on to recount how he witnessed Loomer draw a pentagram on a folder she was holding ahead of a speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition of Palm Beach, thinking it was a Star of David. Milo posted his comments on Twitter/X, boasting that he'd "removed Laura Loomer from the President’s orbit, at the urging of his staff and family." It's still unclear whether this is why the Trump admin targeted Milo. But if he was really "Loomered," as Loomer claims, it would seem that the real goal of his deportation was to remove one of the key sources of compromising allegations about a fanatical Trump loyalist who apparently still plays a pivotal role in the administration's propaganda campaigns – Air Force One rides or not.

    7.1K1.3K525131599K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.4x their median

    One of Lebanon's wealthiest men was just exposed as a dominant force behind the campaign to convince Lebanon to submit to occupying Israel's will. His name is Antoun Sehnaoui, and his girlfriend, former Trump special envoy to Lebanon Morgan Ortagus, publicly bragged that he's been "trained" since birth to "be a supporter of the state of Israel" — and that his actions are "technically illegal" in Lebanon. I broke down his crusade and documented the media mercenaries he's recruited for his mission at @TheGrayzoneNews. https://t.co/r9U5MWR6Zl

    5.7K2.8K135103173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.2x their median

    Thai citizens held a massive protest on Sept 10 outside Israel's embassy in Bangkok in protest of criminal behavior and rampant violence by Israeli tourists Israelis are also accused of illegal landholding, fraud and setting up unauthorized houses of worship in Thailand https://t.co/J7lFo5kHd7

    5.9K2.1K11385100K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 866K followers, an engagement rate of 0.297%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 115K times each, and 2.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

What is Max Blumenthal's engagement rate on X?
Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) has an engagement rate of 0.297%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 865,835 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.297%, Max Blumenthal sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MaxBlumenthal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MaxBlumenthal post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going