Back to @MasaBd1997's profile

まさのりch engagement report

@MasaBd1997 - 185K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 185K followers
Per impression
0.198%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
7.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
27
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.2K interactions, about 119x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tag: #ガレリアtgs2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

まさのりch's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, まさのりch sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 43 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 12, 2025119x their median

    夢叶いました!嬉しすぎる! ハセシンさん手おっきい😘 チームの2人にも感謝 https://t.co/UPGiYGH0Wr

    3.1K1291116275K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202629x their median

    やっぱ強いなぁRas gg!

    759140023K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202619x their median

    GAMING BOOST 2026|第1弾 『 Red Bull × Void GENESIS 』 両ブランドの世界観を落とし込んだ、スペシャルデザインのGENESISが登場! 対象のコンビニエンスストアでRed Bullを購入し、 限定デザインのVoid GENESISが当たる抽選に参加しよう! ゲームの熱狂を、その手に。 キャンペーンの詳細はこちら ▶︎https://t.co/ONkpDOFn6s ※対象商品・応募方法などの詳細はキャンペーンページをご確認ください。 #翼をさずける #AndGAMER

    42958131297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202614x their median

    今年もゆふなくん達と回って来た足ぱんぱん https://t.co/gIxseaVyCb

    36491254K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202612x their median

    なっちいいいい

    316120019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20269.5x their median

    【えぺまつり優勝】ドンピシャさんとCR nethさんと3人で最高の時間過ごしてきた結果 https://t.co/f9SmVB7pvf @YouTubeより 新しい動画投稿です! 良かったらみてね https://t.co/7AjII3AzwI

    241160016K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20268.7x their median

    Bag in はまち🍣 https://t.co/HrMYc3O8fa

    22716016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.2x their median

    普通に飛び起きた はまちもびっくり揺れた みんな気をつけて

    16502017K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20265.4x their median

    でっぷさんやってんなぁ

    14320014K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.1x their median

    でたオリンパスのごみ安置

    8210012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ガレリアtgs2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.198% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.2K interactions, about 119x its own typical post.

What is まさのりch's engagement rate on X?
まさのりch (@MasaBd1997) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 184,516 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, まさのりch sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MasaBd1997 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MasaBd1997 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going