𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧 engagement report
@MarzhePdL - 897K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 897K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #tiktok.
Compared with accounts its own size
𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, 𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧 sits above the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.693% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 27 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jan 23, 202062x their median
Feliz día amigos ❣️ Que opinan ? Foto 1 o 2 🧐 https://t.co/cS9hkpwUFR https://t.co/iUkEMwzd8O
- Aug 7, 20261686x their median
Entonces llegas a cierta edad en la que entiendes porque Britney colapsó, se rapó y le pegó a un señor con un paraguas
- Jul 17, 202630x their median
POV: When you forget you're dating someone petite https://t.co/M1Fd0xPSLp
- Aug 7, 2026905x their median
Lujo de la vida adulta: Tener vecinos y que jamás los escuches.
- Aug 16, 2026748x their median
🇳🇱#URGENTE: Si @elonmusk no hubiera comprado Twitter, hoy no sabríamos nada de lo que está pasando en Holanda… Miles de agricultores holandeses han salido a las calles con tractores. No es una protesta. Es una rebelión abierta contra las políticas progre de la UE que los están destrozando. Van a seguir hasta el final. Hasta que el régimen que los está asfixando caiga. Ellos producen la comida que come Europa. Y ahora Europa los está condenando. La pregunta es simple: ¿Estás con los agricultores… o con los que quieren acabar con ellos?
- Aug 15, 2026610x their median
Pregunta incómoda de sábado: ¿Qué es algo de tu país que te da un poco de vergüenza admitir? 👀 https://t.co/qcmv25gklX
- Aug 5, 2026410x their median
Y luego hay quienes se extrañan de que tantos hayan hecho trampa en el examen de la UNAM, o preguntan si no es exagerado decir que los deshonestos son mayoría… https://t.co/kG44eyDnWl
- Jul 20, 20267.5x their median
🇳🇮‼️| Mediante un acto público, Daniel Ortega, dictador nicaragüense, informó que el país no tendrá elecciones presidenciales: “Aquí (en Nicaragua) no volverán a haber elecciones para que por allí intenten ellos (oposición) atrapar el gobierno, atrapar el poder. Buscaremos leyes para que le pongan un muro, un bloque, a los golpistas, a los vendepatrias, y que por mucha plata que le den los yanquis, no podrán”.
- Aug 9, 2026198x their median
Nadie habla de lo terapéutico que puede ser limpiar tu casa hasta sudar, tomarte una ducha, secarte con una toalla limpia y acostarte en una sábana limpia. La limpieza es vida. Confirmen?
- Aug 19, 2026174x their median
¿Cómo es que SEMARNAT autorizó que 46 osos salieran de un hipódromo en Tijuana para ser exportados a India y Emiratos Árabes Unidos? Dos osos grizzly fueron autorizados por la SEMARNAT para ser exportados a Emiratos Árabes Unidos a principios del 2026 y otros 44 osos negros aparecen en permisos de exportación a India entre 2024 y 2025. Todos procedían de un “zoológico” cuyo permiso tiene como dirección una caballeriza ubicada dentro del Hipódromo Agua Caliente de Tijuana. De acuerdo con los registros oficiales sobre las autorizaciones emitidas por la SEMARNAT para la importación y exportación de ejemplares, partes y derivados de vida silvestre, que obtuvimos mediante una solicitud de transparencia. Encontramos que entre 2024 y 2025 SEMARNAT emitió permisos para enviar a India 44 osos negros (Ursus americanus), especie en Peligro de Extinción en México. Procedentes de Parque Zoológico Internacional, A.C., registro DFYFS-ZOO-P-0005-B.C./98 a nombre de Fernando Celaya Fernández. El primer permiso, CITES MX 129785, fue expedido el 16 de febrero del 2024 durante la administración de María Luisa Albores al frente de SEMARNAT con el que se exportaron 22 osos negros. El 28 de marzo de 2025 SEMARNAT, ya con Alicia Bárcena, emitió un segundo permiso, CITES MX 139631 y especificó que sustituye al permiso otorgado en 2024, a partir de este cambio hay otras 22 exportaciones de osos en diferentes fechas. El 21 de enero del 2026, SEMARNAT autorizó la exportación definitiva a Emiratos Árabes Unidos de 2 osos grizzly (Ursus arctos horribilis) que procedían nuevamente de este supuesto “zoológico”. Este Parque Zoológico Internacional, tiene como dirección una caballeriza y ha pasado de tener registro como UMA a PIMVS. Teniendo permiso de aprovechamiento por parte de la SEMARNAT para venado rojo (Cervus elaphus), búfalo de agua (Bubalus bubalis), llama (Lama glama), emú (Dromaius novaehollandiae), avestruz (Struthio camelus) y dromedario (Camelus dromedarius). También aparecen ganso egipcio (Alopochen aegyptiaca), cisne mudo (Cygnus olor), cisne negro (Cygnus atratus), pavo real (Pavo cristatus) y coatí sudamericano (Nasua nasua). Además tenía autorización para la grulla coronada cuelligrís (Balearica regulorum), especie clasificada internacionalmente en peligro de extinción. Es decir, SEMARNAT mantiene la autorización para el manejo de búfalos, dromedarios, venados, avestruces y otras especies dentro de un establecimiento ubicado en una caballeriza. Incluso SEMARNAT autorizó la exportación definitiva de dos especies de osos sin que se explique su procedencia, ya que los permisos señalan como origen de los ejemplares este supuesto “zoológico”. Los registros de esos ejemplares señalan las autorizaciones de aprovechamiento especiales SGPA/DGVS/04599/20 y SGPA/DGVS/05654/21 y contienen además la anotación “ESPECÍMENES NO SUJETOS PRIMORDIALMENTE A COMERCIO”. La información disponible no permite conocer dónde nacieron los osos, cómo llegaron a este establecimiento, ni quién los recibió en India y Emiratos Árabes Unidos. ¿Nadie revisó a los osos antes de que salieran de México? Si Parque Zoológico Internacional dió como dirección el Hipódromo , ¿cómo es que no se dieron cuenta en PROFEPA? ¿Acaso nunca hicieron una inspección? Alicia Bárcena, ahora deberá explicar cómo es que un establecimiento irregular pudo exportar osos con permisos especiales y de dónde sacaron a estos animales.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 897K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 100K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.
- What is 𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧's engagement rate on X?
- 𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧 (@MarzhePdL) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 897,066 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, 𝐌𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞ó𝐧 sits above the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MarzhePdL have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MarzhePdL post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.