Back to @MarkOgden_'s profile

Mark Ogden engagement report

@MarkOgden_ - 325K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 325K followers
Per impression
0.686%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
12.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
276
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 72% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mark Ogden's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, Mark Ogden sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link72% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 72% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 19, 202694x their median

    Argentina players with their backs to the Spain trophy presentation https://t.co/NlQH9oNH1U

    17K3.6K3.5K2.0K4.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202675x their median

    The wording of the PL statement is so brutal that if City fail to win their appeal, the sanctions will be enormous

    19K2.0K151106360K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202637x their median

    Pep Guardiola’s Man City was built on a false premise, funded by financial chicanery, for his benefit. That’s why his legacy is completely tarnished https://t.co/bKwXnczFuJ

    8.1K1.8K266136248K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202633x their median

    Welcome to Anfield…. https://t.co/yrDVOXo14M

    7.7K1.0K208145620K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202629x their median

    There's a real sense of desperation about Infantino trying to rush through a decision on a 64-team World Cup expansion. Seems like he's made promises he can't keep to people you wouldn't want to upset

    7.2K6137338211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202617x their median

    Almost £2.5bn spent by PL clubs so far this window, but that doesn’t involve Liverpool signing a defensive midfielder or Man Utd signing a left-back. Strange times

    4.2K3383113155K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202612x their median

    Anfield PA playing "Tell Me Lies," by Fleetwood Mac as the players walk off

    2.9K2111572891K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20267.7x their median

    The Czech Republic, the first association to back the Infantino plan, now confirm they are fully aligned with UEFA https://t.co/upvhmpLXJr

    1.9K1872132131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20267.4x their median

    So many images of Argentina players hitting, shoving, tripping Spain players after the WC final. Some pretty big bans heading their way if FIFA deal with it as they should

    1.8K117130865K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20266.6x their median

    Man City verdict is a stain on the club and almost two decades of the Premier League. And the careers of Gerrard, Mourinho, Rodgers, Wenger and so many more https://t.co/ZggSBv3JUq

    1.4K24415515138K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 276 interactions against 325K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.686% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 72% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

What is Mark Ogden's engagement rate on X?
Mark Ogden (@MarkOgden_) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 324,813 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, Mark Ogden sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarkOgden_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarkOgden_ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going