Back to @Mario___RM's profile

(fan) Mario engagement report

@Mario___RM - 145K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.98%
of 145K followers
Per impression
4.87%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
40.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
36 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 4.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 40.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 626K interactions, about 222x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

(fan) Mario's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.98%, (fan) Mario sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,925 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 17, 2023222x their median

    https://t.co/kILbbHbnzv

    423K124K23K57K148M viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 202438x their median

    Te quiero. Gracias por existir. Orgulloso de tenerte de ídolo. En las buenas y en las malas. No tenías que demostrar nada ya. Yo vi jugar al mejor jugador de la historia, yo disfruté de la carrera de Cristiano Ronaldo. https://t.co/Pts19Y8gIG

    86K19K1.5K62918M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202610x their median

    No le preguntes a un hombre su salario. No le preguntes a una mujer su edad. No le preguntes a Rodri y Pep Guardiola por qué decidieron irse del Manchester City este verano con tanta prisa.

    28K1.7K7217355K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20269.2x their median

    - Caso Negreira cuando entrenaba al Barça. - Pasó sin pena ni gloria por el Bayern. - 114 infracciones del Manchester City en su etapa como entrenador. La mayor mentira de la historia del fútbol. https://t.co/WNBLdds0F5

    22K3.2K315141397K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.6x their median

    Raphinha será el nuevo 10 de Brazil El mayor upgrade de la historia https://t.co/5WdxduxA4A

    20K74818450477K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.0x their median

    Las 3 Champions Leagues consecutivas de Carlo Ancelotti y el Balón de Oro 2023 y 2024 de Vinicius Junior. Que la UEFA actúe también y nos devuelvan lo que nos corresponde. https://t.co/WAwFw0a8ia

    13K808391711.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.4x their median

    Prefiero perder probándolos a ellos que seguir viendo lo mismo con Tchouameni y Camavinga. https://t.co/63SEsqMnY4

    12K5277921225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.8x their median

    No tuvo que hacer ninguna campaña por el Balón de Oro, el pueblo habló por él. https://t.co/CRtrQbnkbt

    9.7K7995527189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.1x their median

    Ancelotti ha puesto a hacer flexiones a Vinicius si fallaba un tiro😭😭😭. https://t.co/lFlc9XsZTK

    8.4K2179233209K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.6x their median

    Florentino, hay que pescar en río revuelto. https://t.co/EhHkePxSId

    7.1K213681593K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.8K interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 4.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 40.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 626K interactions, about 222x its own typical post.

What is (fan) Mario's engagement rate on X?
(fan) Mario (@Mario___RM) has an engagement rate of 1.98%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,586 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.98%, (fan) Mario sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mario___RM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Mario___RM post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going