Madelon Vos engagement report
@MadelonVos__ - 85K followers on X
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 732 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.864%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Madelon Vos's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.864%, Madelon Vos sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.698% to 2.61%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 369 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 20268.5x their median
BREAKING: COINBASE JUST ANNOUNCED THEY HAVE NOW OFFICIALLY LAUNCHED #BITCOIN BACKED MORTGAGES 120 MILLION AMERICANS CAN NOW BUY A HOME USING BTC AS COLLATERAL THIS IS ABSOLUTELY HISTORIC 🔥 https://t.co/2zW5pZEZj6
- Sep 29, 20263.3x their median
Ik zie vrij heftige uitspraken voorbij komen in de legacy Media en hier op X over de Box 3 plannen. Bij Nieuws van de Dag duidt Erik de Zwart zojuist: “de minister wil 2,5 miljoen mensen éxtra voor hun bek slaan, ze worden namelijk extra belast door deze plannen van de overheid.” “In een sok stoppen is misschien zelfs het meest verstandige” “Het zal de run op Spaanse huizen vergroten, mensen zullen denken: Ik pak mijn biezen want ik wordt aan alle kanten beroofd.” Ben jij het eens met Erik?
- Sep 29, 20262.5x their median
Elke keer denk ik: gekker kunnen ze het niet maken. En elke keer blijkt mijn verbeelding beperkter dan hun belastingplannen. Mijn hemel. Ik krijg me toch een partij zin om te gaan rebelleren. Waar ligt voor jou de grens?
- Sep 29, 20262.2x their median
“Ik pak mijn biezen, want ik word aan alle kanten beroofd.” zullen steeds meer mensen volgens Erik de Zwart denken. En dat is niet zo gek ook nu vermogens vanaf om en nabij de €10.000,- al in aanraking zullen komen voor 36% Box 3 belasting op alles boven de €1000 aan rendement.
- Sep 29, 20261.8x their median
Box 3 plannen uitgelekt: Het belastingvrije rendement zal dalen van €1800 naar €1000. Hierdoor gaan juist honderdduizenden méér spaarders en beleggers box 3 betalen. Iedereen die meer dan €1000 rendement behaalt, betaalt straks 36% belasting over het deel boven die grens. Het Overton Window in full effect. Van vermogensaanwas-, naar een hele scherpe vermogenswinst belasting.
- Oct 1, 20261.8x their median
De overheid is zo'n onbetrouwbare partner in deze... Nieuwe verkiezingen uitroepen lijkt mij verstandiger dan doorgaan op deze voet. Ingrijpende Box 3 beslissingen als deze verdienen een helder democratisch mandaat. Wat een blamage!
- Sep 29, 20261.7x their median
We doen het volgende voor een krachtige economie, ondernemers en harde werkers: ☑️ Geen belasting op papieren winst in box 3, alleen op werkelijke winst ☑️ €450 miljoen extra voor de koopkracht van werkenden. Werkenden betalen minder snel het hoogste tarief ☑️ Ondernemen wordt meer lonend (lager tarief Box 2) ☑️ De overheid investeert meer in infrastructuur (€5 miljard extra) en bezuinigt structureel €3.5 miljard op zichzelf ☑️ Uitkeringen worden hervormd, zodat meer mensen werken en het sociaal vangnet behouden blijft voor wie het echt nodig heeft ☑️ De belasting op erfenissen en het eigen huis blijft onveranderd
- Sep 29, 2026
Wel bizar hoor: vermogensaanwasbelasting werd aangedragen als de énige mogelijkheid, omdat vermogenswinstbelasting voor de systemen van de fiscus veel te ingewikkeld was. Nu blijkt: vermogenswinstbelasting kan ineens toch wel vanaf 2028 (en raakt iedereen met +/-10k aan beleggingen), maaaaar niet voor bitcoin en cryptobezitters met vermogen op een Ledger. Zij worden ieder jaar gestraft in de vorm van vermogensaanwas belasting. Bewaar je het bij een bank dan geldt vermogenswinstbelasting. Wat een gelulhannes! Kan iemand mij vertellen waarom @Minister_FIN dit in vredesnaam geaccordeerd heeft?!
- Sep 30, 2026
Door vanaf 2028 vermogensaanwasbelasting toe te passen op bitcoin en crypto zal menig belegger voor die tijd verkopen. Zij stappen in een bitcoin/crypto ETF, ETN, ETP, want vermogenswinstbelasting. In 2030 vallen bitcoin en crypto ook onder vermogenswinstbelasting. Beleggers gaan hun ETF, ETN, ETP, echter niet verkopen om weer in te ruilen voor 'echter bitcoin/crypto', want dan komt vermogenswinstbelasting om de hoek kijken. Belasting is de gedragsprikkel. Controle is het doel.
- Sep 30, 2026
Het begrotingsplan van het kabinet gaat nu al op de helling. De coalitie is geschrokken van de eigen plannen van gisteren en de boze reacties van spaarders 👇 @nieuwsuur https://t.co/xvXfFly7Cr
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 732 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0.864%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 39.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.
- What is Madelon Vos's engagement rate on X?
- Madelon Vos (@MadelonVos__) has an engagement rate of 0.864%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,173 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.864%, Madelon Vos sits above the 75th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MadelonVos__ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MadelonVos__ post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.